Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

All EU acts

GDPR — Regulation (EU) 2016/679

CELEX 32016R0679 · Read 2026-08-12

The act our reading of public sources is measured against: lawful basis, purpose limitation and the rights of the person a page mentions.

Identifier

CELEX
32016R0679
Identifier
EU 2016/679
Adopted
2016-04-27
In force
2016-05-24
Applies from
2018-05-25
Articles
99

Chapters

  • I General provisions1–4
  • II Principles5–11
  • III Rights of the data subject12–23
  • IV Controller and processor24–43
  • V Transfers of personal data to third countries or international organisations44–50
  • VI Independent supervisory authorities51–59
  • VII Cooperation and consistency60–76
  • VIII Remedies, liability and penalties77–84
  • IX Provisions relating to specific processing situations85–91
  • X Delegated acts and implementing acts92–93
  • XI Final provisions94–99

Articles

99 articles are read into the register, one address each. Read on 2026-08-18.

Judgments of the Court of Justice

40 decisions

  • C-422/24Court of Justice of the European Union

    Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten v AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 13 and 14 – Scope – Personal data collected by means of body cameras worn by ticket inspectors on public transport – Legal basis for the obligation on the data controller to provide information to the data subject.

  • C-492/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    X v Russmedia Digital SRL and Inform Media Press SRL

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Responsibility of the operator of an online marketplace for the publication of personal data contained in advertisements placed on its online marketplace by user advertisers – Article 5(2) – Principle of accountability – Article 26 – Joint control with user advertisers – Article 9(1) and (2)(a) – Advertisements containing sensitive data – Lawfulness of processing – Consent – Articles 24, 25 and 32 – Obligations of the controller – Prior identification of the advertisements containing such data – Prior identification of the identity of the user advertiser – Refusal of publication of unlawful advertisements – Security measures such as to prevent the copying of advertisements and their publication on other websites – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Articles 12 to 15 – Possibility for such an operator, with regard to an infringement of those obligations, to rely on the exemption from liability of an intermediary information society service provider.

  • C-655/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    IP v Quirin Privatbank AG

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Rights of the data subject – Article 17 – Right to erasure of data – Article 18 – Right to restriction of processing – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Unlawful processing of personal data – Action seeking an order requiring the controller to refrain from any further unlawful processing in the future – Basis – Conditions – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Assessment of the compensation – Possible consideration of the degree of fault on the part of the controller – Possible impact of the grant of a ‘prohibitory injunction’.

  • 62023CJ0313Court of Justice of the European Union

    Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet

    Joined Cases C-313/23, C-316/23 and C-332/23.

  • C-710/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    L. H. v Ministerstvo zdravotnictví

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4 – Definitions – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Article 86 – Public access to official documents – Data concerning the representative of a legal person – Case-law of a national court imposing an obligation to inform and consult the data subject prior to disclosure of official documents containing such data.

  • C-247/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    VP v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(d) – Principle of accuracy – Article 16 – Right to rectification – Article 23 – Restrictions – Data relating to gender identity – Data incorrect from the time of inclusion in a public register – Means of proof – Administrative practice of requesting proof of gender reassignment surgery.

  • C-203/22Court of Justice of the European Union

    CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 15(1)(h) – Automated decision-making, including profiling – Scoring – Assessment of the creditworthiness of a natural person – Access to meaningful information about the logic involved in profiling – Verification of the accuracy of the information provided – Directive (EU) 2016/943 – Point 1 of Article 2 – Trade secret – Personal data of third parties.

  • C-638/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung v Datenschutzbehörde

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Direct designation of the controller by national law – Auxiliary administrative entity in the service of a regional government – Lack of legal personality – Lack of legal capacity of the entity’s own – Determination of the purposes and means of the processing.

  • C-383/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    Criminal proceedings against ILVA A/S

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 83(4) to (6) and (9) – Concept of an ‘undertaking’ – Parent company and subsidiary – Infringement of that regulation by a subsidiary – Calculation of the amount of the fine – Consideration of the total turnover of the group of which that subsidiary forms part.

  • C-394/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    Mousse v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and SNCF Connect

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(c) – Data minimisation – Article 6(1) – Lawfulness of processing – Data relating to title and gender identity – Online sale of travel documents – Article 21 – Right to object.

  • C-416/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde v F R

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 57(1)(f) and Article 57(4) – Tasks of the supervisory authority – Concepts of a ‘request’ and ‘excessive requests’ – Charging of a reasonable fee or refusal to act on requests in the event of manifestly unfounded or excessive requests – Criteria which may guide the supervisory authority in making its choice – Article 77(1) – Concept of a ‘complaint’.

  • C-65/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    MK v K GmbH

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 88(1) and (2) – Processing in the context of employment – Employees’ personal data – More specific rules provided for by a Member State pursuant to that Article 88 – Obligation to comply with Article 5, Article 6(1) and Article 9(1) and (2) of that regulation – Processing on the basis of a collective agreement – Margin of discretion of the parties to the collective agreement as regards the necessity of the processing of personal data provided for by that agreement – Scope of judicial review.

Binding case law

40 judgments the Court itself has marked as interpreting this act.

  • C-422/24Court of Justice of the European Union

    Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten v AB Storstockholms Lokaltrafik

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 13 and 14 – Scope – Personal data collected by means of body cameras worn by ticket inspectors on public transport – Legal basis for the obligation on the data controller to provide information to the data subject.

    ECLI:EU:C:2025:980EUR-LexThe Court
  • C-492/233ca6f0a7-954d-4b0b-8898-78c385afdf90

    X v Russmedia Digital SRL and Inform Media Press SRL

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Responsibility of the operator of an online marketplace for the publication of personal data contained in advertisements placed on its online marketplace by user advertisers – Article 5(2) – Principle of accountability – Article 26 – Joint control with user advertisers – Article 9(1) and (2)(a) – Advertisements containing sensitive data – Lawfulness of processing – Consent – Articles 24, 25 and 32 – Obligations of the controller – Prior identification of the advertisements containing such data – Prior identification of the identity of the user advertiser – Refusal of publication of unlawful advertisements – Security measures such as to prevent the copying of advertisements and their publication on other websites – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Articles 12 to 15 – Possibility for such an operator, with regard to an infringement of those obligations, to rely on the exemption from liability of an intermediary information society service provider.

    ECLI:EU:C:2025:935EUR-LexThe Court
  • C-655/238e01d479-c04c-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1

    IP v Quirin Privatbank AG

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Rights of the data subject – Article 17 – Right to erasure of data – Article 18 – Right to restriction of processing – Article 79 – Right to an effective judicial remedy – Unlawful processing of personal data – Action seeking an order requiring the controller to refrain from any further unlawful processing in the future – Basis – Conditions – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation – Concept of ‘non-material damage’ – Assessment of the compensation – Possible consideration of the degree of fault on the part of the controller – Possible impact of the grant of a ‘prohibitory injunction’.

    ECLI:EU:C:2025:655EUR-LexThe Court
  • 62023CJ0313eb8869f3-bbfe-402d-ba9e-141449ccf989

    Inspektorat kam Visshia sadeben savet

    Joined Cases C-313/23, C-316/23 and C-332/23.

    ECLI:EU:C:2025:303EUR-LexThe Court
  • C-710/23957a16f7-c757-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1

    L. H. v Ministerstvo zdravotnictví

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4 – Definitions – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Article 86 – Public access to official documents – Data concerning the representative of a legal person – Case-law of a national court imposing an obligation to inform and consult the data subject prior to disclosure of official documents containing such data.

    ECLI:EU:C:2025:231EUR-LexThe Court
  • C-247/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    VP v Országos Idegenrendészeti Főigazgatóság

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(d) – Principle of accuracy – Article 16 – Right to rectification – Article 23 – Restrictions – Data relating to gender identity – Data incorrect from the time of inclusion in a public register – Means of proof – Administrative practice of requesting proof of gender reassignment surgery.

    ECLI:EU:C:2025:172EUR-LexThe Court
  • C-203/22957a16f7-c757-11ea-adf7-01aa75ed71a1

    CK v Magistrat der Stadt Wien

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 15(1)(h) – Automated decision-making, including profiling – Scoring – Assessment of the creditworthiness of a natural person – Access to meaningful information about the logic involved in profiling – Verification of the accuracy of the information provided – Directive (EU) 2016/943 – Point 1 of Article 2 – Trade secret – Personal data of third parties.

    ECLI:EU:C:2025:117EUR-LexThe Court
  • C-638/238e01d479-c04c-11e5-9e54-01aa75ed71a1

    Amt der Tiroler Landesregierung v Datenschutzbehörde

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4(7) – Concept of ‘controller’ – Direct designation of the controller by national law – Auxiliary administrative entity in the service of a regional government – Lack of legal personality – Lack of legal capacity of the entity’s own – Determination of the purposes and means of the processing.

    ECLI:EU:C:2025:127EUR-LexThe Court

Read from the Publications Office of the European Union on 2026-08-22.

Supervisory bodies

Official source

National instruments

Change monitoring

The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

Change monitoring
FieldValue
RegisterEUR-Lex
PublisherEuropeiska unionens publikationsbyrå
Last read2026-08-16
IntervalEvery 30 days
Next re-read2026-09-15
StatusChecked against the publisher
Open the register at the publisher

Row history

Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

Row history
DateEventSource
2026-08-16Row read against EUR-LexEuropeiska unionens publikationsbyrå
2018-05-25Date of application under the actEUR-Lex
2016-05-24Entry into force under CELEX 32016R0679EUR-Lex

Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

CELEX 32016R0679, GDPR — Regulation (EU) 2016/679. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/gdpr-2016-679 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:ff8a4b6c7854289c, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

sha256:
ff8a4b6c7854289cd4db8fb52c92d1601da3f90586a15d30065a9bc8725b2258
hämtad:
2026-08-25
source_confidence:
official
bygge:
legal-2026-08-25

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Europeiska unionens publikationsbyrå, EUR-Lex.

The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
  • No sentence written by a language model
  • Engine version and read date on every answer
  • No customer data, no documents, no advice
  • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

Model cardAudit