Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment

C-394/23Mousse v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and SNCF Connect

Decided
2025-01-09
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2025:2
CELEX
62023CJ0394
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

Also searched as: Case C-394/23, C-394/23 2025, ECLI:EU:C:2025:2.

The court's own keywords

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(c) – Data minimisation – Article 6(1) – Lawfulness of processing – Data relating to title and gender identity – Online sale of travel documents – Article 21 – Right to object.

Interprets

Core objects in the machine route

Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed

This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.

Source: NovaCopilot

Node map: relations between precedents

How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.

Reading relations …

Source: NovaCopilot

NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

Source: NovaCopilot

Articles in the ruling

The provisions are named in the court own keyword line. Read the article text here, the ruling at the source.

Get official document

Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works

Machine addresses

id
eu:c-394-23

Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit