Decisions applying this article
Decisions tied to article and paragraph
A decision becomes usable once you can see which article it applies and where in the reasons that happens. Each line carries court, citation, date, the legal question in one sentence and the paragraph numbers.
9 · 2026-08-18
Court of Justice of the European Union · ECLI:EU:C:2023:537
Whether a competition authority may examine data protection questions, and on what basis data from third-party sources may be processed.
- C-300/21 · Österreichische Post2023-05-04
Court of Justice of the European Union · ECLI:EU:C:2023:370
Whether an infringement in itself gives a right to compensation, or whether actual damage must be shown.
- [2021] UKSC 50 · Lloyd mot Google LLC2021-11-10
Supreme Court of the United Kingdom
Whether damages for a data protection infringement can be awarded uniformly across a class without proof of harm per person.
Court of Appeal of England and Wales
Whether police use of automated facial recognition had a sufficient legal basis and a sufficient impact assessment.
Federal Court of Justice of Germany
How the balance between the right to erasure and freedom of expression is struck when a search engine surfaces an article about a named person.
Court of Justice of the European Union · ECLI:EU:C:2020:559
Whether an adequacy decision and standard contractual clauses suffice for a transfer of personal data to a third country.
GDPR 45 · Paragraphs 94, 105GDPR 46 · Paragraphs 121, 133, 134
- C-673/17 · Planet492019-10-01
Court of Justice of the European Union · ECLI:EU:C:2019:801
Whether a pre-ticked box can amount to consent to storing cookies on a user's device.
- C-40/17 · Fashion ID2019-07-29
Court of Justice of the European Union · ECLI:EU:C:2019:629
Whether a site that embeds a third-party button is a joint controller for the collection of the data.
- C-131/12 · Google Spain och Google2014-05-13
Court of Justice of the European Union · ECLI:EU:C:2014:317
Whether a search engine must remove results on a person's name when the data are no longer relevant.
Identifiers, dates and links. No legal text is reproduced and nothing here is legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Six fixed blocks, one source per line
- No sentence written by a language model
- Engine version and read date on every answer
- No customer data, no documents, no advice
- Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act