Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · GDPR

Article 6Lawfulness of processing

CELEX 32016R0679 · Read on 2026-08-18 · Chapter II

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. Processing shall be lawful only if and to the extent that at least one of the following applies:

(a)

the data subject has given consent to the processing of his or her personal data for one or more specific purposes;

(b)

processing is necessary for the performance of a contract to which the data subject is party or in order to take steps at the request of the data subject prior to entering into a contract;

(c)

processing is necessary for compliance with a legal obligation to which the controller is subject;

(d)

processing is necessary in order to protect the vital interests of the data subject or of another natural person;

(e)

processing is necessary for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller;

(f)

processing is necessary for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party, except where such interests are overridden by the interests or fundamental rights and freedoms of the data subject which require protection of personal data, in particular where the data subject is a child.

Point (f) of the first subparagraph shall not apply to processing carried out by public authorities in the performance of their tasks.

The article continues in the official text.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Other articles in this chapter

Related articles

Articles in other acts connected to this one, with the reason written against the text. The map is a route between acts, not an assessment.

  • Depends on · incomingePrivacy · 5

    The protection of confidentiality of communications rests on a consent whose meaning is taken from the data protection regulation, which also carries the other bases.

    CELEX 32002L0058 · 2026-08-18

Decisions applying this article

Court, citation and the paragraphs of the reasons where the article is dealt with.

Judgments of the Court of Justice

6 decisions

  • C-710/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    L. H. v Ministerstvo zdravotnictví

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 4 – Definitions – Article 6 – Lawfulness of processing – Article 86 – Public access to official documents – Data concerning the representative of a legal person – Case-law of a national court imposing an obligation to inform and consult the data subject prior to disclosure of official documents containing such data.

  • C-394/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    Mousse v Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL) and SNCF Connect

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(c) – Data minimisation – Article 6(1) – Lawfulness of processing – Data relating to title and gender identity – Online sale of travel documents – Article 21 – Right to object.

  • C-65/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    MK v K GmbH

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 88(1) and (2) – Processing in the context of employment – Employees’ personal data – More specific rules provided for by a Member State pursuant to that Article 88 – Obligation to comply with Article 5, Article 6(1) and Article 9(1) and (2) of that regulation – Processing on the basis of a collective agreement – Margin of discretion of the parties to the collective agreement as regards the necessity of the processing of personal data provided for by that agreement – Scope of judicial review.

  • C-621/22Court of Justice of the European Union

    Koninklijke Nederlandse Lawn Tennisbond v Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 5(1)(a) – Lawfulness of processing – Point (f) of the first subparagraph of Article 6(1) – Necessity of processing for the purposes of the legitimate interests pursued by the controller or by a third party – Concept of ‘legitimate interests’ – Commercial interest – Sports federation – Disclosure, for consideration, of the personal data of the members of a sports federation to sponsors without the consent of those members.

  • C-740/22Court of Justice of the European Union

    Endemol Shine Finland Oy

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Articles 2, 4, 6, 10 and 86 – Data held by a court relating to the criminal convictions of a natural person – Oral disclosure of such data to a commercial company on account of a competition organised by that company – Concept of ‘processing of personal data’ – National legislation governing access to those data – Reconciliation between the right of public access to official documents and the protection of personal data.

  • C-667/21Court of Justice of the European Union

    ZQ v Medizinischer Dienst der Krankenversicherung Nordrhein, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 6(1) – Conditions for lawful processing – Article 9(1) to (3) – Processing of special categories of data – Data concerning health – Assessment of an employee’s working capacity – Health insurance medical service processing data concerning the health of its own employees – Conditions for such processing and whether permissible – Article 82(1) – Right to compensation and liability – Compensation for non-material damage – Compensatory function – Impact of negligence on the part of the data controller.

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
  • No sentence written by a language model
  • Engine version and read date on every answer
  • No customer data, no documents, no advice
  • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

Model cardAudit