Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Agent · psd2-2015-2366-68

PSD2 artikel 68: Limits of the use of the payment instrument and of the access to payment accounts by payment service providers

Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.

CELEX 32015L2366 · 2026-08-18 · Weight 59 · minimal-risk

OpenOpen reading. No metering is planned for this class.

PSD2Official source

What this page is
Agent, PSD2 artikel 68
Checked against the official source
2026-08-18Current
Responsible publisher
ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position

Jurisdiction

The same agent, read through one country's lens.

Inputs

  • in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
  • punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7)

Rule tree

  1. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)

    Paragraph 1 applies

    1. Where a specific payment instrument is used for the purposes of giving consent, the payer and the payer’s payment service provider may agree on spending limits for payment transactions executed through that payment instrument.

    Paragraph 1

  2. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)

    Paragraph 2 applies

    2. If agreed in the framework contract, the payment service provider may reserve the right to block the payment instrument for objectively justified reasons relating to the security of the payment instrument, the suspicion of unauthorised or fraudulent use of the payment instrument or, in the case of a payment instrument with a credit line, a significantly increased risk that the payer may be unable to fulfil its lia…

    Paragraph 2

  3. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)

    Paragraph 3 applies

    3. In such cases the payment service provider shall inform the payer of the blocking of the payment instrument and the reasons for it in an agreed manner, where possible, before the payment instrument is blocked and at the latest immediately thereafter, unless providing such information would compromise objectively justified security reasons or is prohibited by other relevant Union or national law.

    Paragraph 3

  4. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)

    Paragraph 4 applies

    4. The payment service provider shall unblock the payment instrument or replace it with a new payment instrument once the reasons for blocking no longer exist.

    Paragraph 4

  5. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)

    Paragraph 5 applies

    5. An account servicing payment service provider may deny an account information service provider or a payment initiation service provider access to a payment account for objectively justified and duly evidenced reasons relating to unauthorised or fraudulent access to the payment account by that account information service provider or that payment initiation service provider, including the unauthorised or fraudulent…

    Paragraph 5

  6. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 6)

    Paragraph 6 applies

    The account servicing payment service provider shall allow access to the payment account once the reasons for denying access no longer exist.

    Paragraph 6

  7. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 7)

    Paragraph 7 applies

    6. In the cases referred to in paragraph 5, the account servicing payment service provider shall immediately report the incident relating to the account information service provider or the payment initiation service provider to the competent authority. The information shall include the relevant details of the case and the reasons for taking action. The competent authority shall assess the case and shall, if necessary…

    Paragraph 7

If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

The article text as read

  1. 11. Where a specific payment instrument is used for the purposes of giving consent, the payer and the payer’s payment service provider may agree on spending limits for payment transactions executed through that payment instrument.
  2. 22. If agreed in the framework contract, the payment service provider may reserve the right to block the payment instrument for objectively justified reasons relating to the security of the payment instrument, the suspicion of unauthorised or fraudulent use of the payment instrument or, in the case of a payment instrument with a credit line, a significantly increased risk that the payer may be unable to fulfil its liability to pay.
  3. 33. In such cases the payment service provider shall inform the payer of the blocking of the payment instrument and the reasons for it in an agreed manner, where possible, before the payment instrument is blocked and at the latest immediately thereafter, unless providing such information would compromise objectively justified security reasons or is prohibited by other relevant Union or national law.
  4. 44. The payment service provider shall unblock the payment instrument or replace it with a new payment instrument once the reasons for blocking no longer exist.
  5. 55. An account servicing payment service provider may deny an account information service provider or a payment initiation service provider access to a payment account for objectively justified and duly evidenced reasons relating to unauthorised or fraudulent access to the payment account by that account information service provider or that payment initiation service provider, including the unauthorised or fraudulent initiation of a payment transaction. In such cases the account servicing payment service provider shall inform the payer that access to the payment account is denied and the reasons therefor in the form agreed. That information shall, where possible, be given to the payer before access is denied and at the latest immediately thereafter, unless providing such information would compromise objectively justified security reasons or is prohibited by other relevant Union or national law.
  6. 6The account servicing payment service provider shall allow access to the payment account once the reasons for denying access no longer exist.
  7. 76. In the cases referred to in paragraph 5, the account servicing payment service provider shall immediately report the incident relating to the account information service provider or the payment initiation service provider to the competent authority. The information shall include the relevant details of the case and the reasons for taking action. The competent authority shall assess the case and shall, if necessary, take appropriate measures.

Lineage

treatyTFEU art. 288 (direktiv)
act32015L2366
chapter
article68
paragraphs7
jurisdictionEuropean Union (EU)
supervisorFinansinspektionen — Sweden
national

Interface

callhttps://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/agents/psd2-2015-2366-68/run
methodGET
outputmatched, outcome, trace, missing, hash
Quota60 anrop per minut och adress, utan nyckel
stabilityRegelträdet versioneras. En ändring byter artefakthash, aldrig adress.

Hashes

textsha256:7e5aad4c002cc1aae008dc54d8231a2d1eba79129dabaa0052ab6a4983ea9d3b
scriptsha256:f3e774372a32e0e1a864c2d8d69cfdcb4643d6371a8fd461d8e2b122b5098089
enginesha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0
agentsha256:ed3042ac1e4f673455b93ab04d211bbac242e6932132d55ce1468093e7585abd
versionagent-engine-1+legal-2026-08-25 / ed3042ac1e4f6734

Artefacts

No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Citation: 32015L2366 art. 68, Limits of the use of the payment instrument and of the access to payment accounts by payment service providers. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/psd2-2015-2366/artikel-68 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:4664da6ca1b8aacd, bygge legal-2026-08-25).