Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

NJA 2018 s. 936

Om det undersökta företaget har rätt att överklaga åtgärden att kopiera information

Platsundersökning enligt konkurrenslagen. Fråga om det undersökta företaget har rätt att överklaga åtgärden att kopiera information. När företaget motsätter sig kopiering av handlingar åligger det Konkurrensverket att begära handräckning hos Kronofogdemyndigheten.

Core question

Fråga om det undersökta företaget har rätt att överklaga åtgärden att kopiera information

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Platsundersökning enligt konkurrenslagen.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden, 2018. Applies Konkurrenslagen.

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden
  • Applies one statute
  • 34 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about transactions and competition.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2018-s-936/manifest.json

    Court
    Supreme Court of Sweden
    Decided
    2018-11-30
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr Ö 5652-17

    • 5 kap. 3 §, 6 §, 7 §, 8 §, 9 §, 10 § och 11 § konkurrenslagen (2008:579)
    Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-08-29.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-08-29
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-09-28
    StatusChecked against the publisher
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2018-11-30Date of decision according to Högsta domstolenHögsta domstolen
    2008-11-01Applied statute in force: SFS 2008:579Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    NJA 2018 s. 936, Platsundersökning enligt konkurrenslagen. Fråga om det undersökta företaget har rätt att överklaga åtgärden att kopiera information. När företaget motsätter sig kopiering av handlingar åligger det Konkurrensverket att begära handräckning hos Kronofogdemyndigheten.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2018-s-936 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:fb3f423e0973b0cb, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

    sha256:
    fb3f423e0973b0cb3fe0bbdd0d11c841a19eb209dab858641cda18e3827a26bf
    hämtad:
    2026-08-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-08-25

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.