Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

AD 2018 nr 19

Tvisten gäller fråga om en skola direkt eller indirekt har diskriminerat en kvinnlig lärarvikarie framför allt genom att uppställa ett krav…

Tvisten gäller fråga om en skola direkt eller indirekt har diskriminerat en kvinnlig lärarvikarie framför allt genom att uppställa ett krav på att handhälsa även på manliga kollegor.

Core question

Tvisten gäller fråga om en skola direkt eller indirekt har diskriminerat en kvinnlig lärarvikarie framför allt genom att uppställa ett krav på att handhälsa även på manliga kollegor

The decision in three points

  1. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Swedish Labour Court, 2018. Applies Diskrimineringslagen.

Related questions

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Swedish Labour Court
  • Applies one statute
  • 57 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about employment law, and 6 question pages in the register rest on the same statute.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Decisions (8)

Agent commands

  • runCaseSummary()

    The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

  • runLegalImpact()

    Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

  • runObligationCheck()

    Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

  • runProofVerify()

    Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2018-19/manifest.json

Court
Swedish Labour Court
Decided
2018-04-11
Applies
1

Mål nr A 12-17

  • 2 kap. och 5 kap. 1 §, 2 §, 6 kap. 3 §, 1 kap. 4 §, 5 §, 6 §, 7 §, 3 kap. 14 §, 15 § och 16 § diskrimineringslagen (2008:567)
Arbetsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

Statutes

Case law

Case law read on 2026-08-29.

Change monitoring

The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

Change monitoring
FieldValue
RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
PublisherSveriges Domstolar
Last read2026-08-29
IntervalEvery 30 days
Next re-read2026-09-28
StatusChecked against the publisher
Open the register at the publisher

Row history

Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

Row history
DateEventSource
2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
2018-04-11Date of decision according to ArbetsdomstolenArbetsdomstolen
2009-01-01Applied statute in force: SFS 2008:567Sveriges riksdag

Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

AD 2018 nr 19, Tvisten gäller fråga om en skola direkt eller indirekt har diskriminerat en kvinnlig lärarvikarie framför allt genom att uppställa ett krav på att handhälsa även på manliga kollegor.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2018-19 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:f4145d4b0551b795, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

sha256:
f4145d4b0551b7957f897e6290a41130e8943391249d74c76d3c559f4add3e4c
hämtad:
2026-08-25
source_confidence:
official
bygge:
legal-2026-08-25

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Arbetsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.