Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

AD 2012 nr 27

Dessutom fråga huruvida arbetsgivaren har åsidosatt skyldighet att utreda och vidta åtgärder mot trakasserier

Fråga om en svetsare av nigerianskt ursprung har utsatts för etnisk diskriminering genom arbetsgivarens sätt att utöva arbetsledning i olika situationer. Dessutom fråga huruvida arbetsgivaren har åsidosatt skyldighet att utreda och vidta åtgärder mot trakasserier.

Core question

Fråga om en svetsare av nigerianskt ursprung har utsatts för etnisk diskriminering genom arbetsgivarens sätt att utöva arbetsledning i olika situationer

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Dessutom fråga huruvida arbetsgivaren har åsidosatt skyldighet att utreda och vidta åtgärder mot trakasserier.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Swedish Labour Court, 2012. Applies Diskrimineringslagen.

Related questions

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Swedish Labour Court
  • Applies one statute
  • 57 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about employment law, and 6 question pages in the register rest on the same statute.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Decisions (8)

Agent commands

  • runCaseSummary()

    The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

  • runLegalImpact()

    Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

  • runObligationCheck()

    Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

  • runProofVerify()

    Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2012-27/manifest.json

Court
Swedish Labour Court
Decided
2012-04-18
Applies
1

Mål nr A 197-10

  • 1 kap. 4 §, 2 kap. 1 § och 6 kap. 3 § diskrimineringslagen (2008:567)
Arbetsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

Statutes

Case law

Case law read on 2026-08-29.

Change monitoring

The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

Change monitoring
FieldValue
RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
PublisherSveriges Domstolar
Last read2026-08-29
IntervalEvery 30 days
Next re-read2026-09-28
StatusChecked against the publisher
Open the register at the publisher

Row history

Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

Row history
DateEventSource
2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
2012-04-18Date of decision according to ArbetsdomstolenArbetsdomstolen
2009-01-01Applied statute in force: SFS 2008:567Sveriges riksdag

Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

AD 2012 nr 27, Fråga om en svetsare av nigerianskt ursprung har utsatts för etnisk diskriminering genom arbetsgivarens sätt att utöva arbetsledning i olika situationer. Dessutom fråga huruvida arbetsgivaren har åsidosatt skyldighet att utreda och vidta åtgärder mot trakasserier.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2012-27 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:7dc25c5c21a05fc8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

sha256:
7dc25c5c21a05fc817f686d88cd9b86fd0660f2bb90d87daeba4f941a4fed63e
hämtad:
2026-08-25
source_confidence:
official
bygge:
legal-2026-08-25

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Arbetsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.