Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C-161/25Autorità di regolazione dei trasporti v Captrain Italia and Others
- Decided
- 2026-10-15
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2026:860
- CELEX
- 62025CJ0161
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
Also searched as: Case C-161/25, C-161/25 2026, ECLI:EU:C:2026:860.
The court's own keywords
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Single railway area – Article 35 – Performance scheme – Scope – Penalties for the disruption caused by railway undertakings – General scheme of penalties applicable in the event of delay on the entire national network – Penalties which may be imposed, depending on the entity to which the delay is attributable, either on the infrastructure manager or on the railway undertaking – Specific scheme of penalties applicable in the event that the stop time in stations connecting with foreign rail networks is exceeded – Penalties imposed solely on railway undertakings – Whether combination of several penalty schemes permissible – Conditions – Annex VI, point 2 – Observance of the basic principles of the performance scheme – Article 56 – Regulatory body – Extent of the supervision – Principle of proportionality.
Interprets
Core objects in the machine route
Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed
This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.
- Finality status
- Precedent and holding
- Relations between precedents
- Agent object, risk graph and relation graph
- Change graph
- Provenance and verified text
Source: NovaCopilot
Node map: relations between precedents
How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.
Reading relations …
Source: NovaCopilot
Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works
Machine addresses
- id
- eu:c-161-25
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit