Agent · eidas-910-2014-41
eIDAS 2.0 artikel 41: Legal effect of electronic time stamps
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
CELEX 32014R0910 · 2026-08-26 · Weight 80 · minimal-risk
ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.
- What this page is
- Agent, eIDAS 2.0 artikel 41
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-26Current
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does eIDAS 2.0 Article 41 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
eIDAS 2.0 Article 41 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 2 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-26 against CELEX 32014R0910. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
eIDAS 2.0 Article 41Checked against the publisher 2026-08-26Official text
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. An electronic time stamp shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements of the qualified electronic time stamp.
- Paragraph 2 applies. 2. A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound.
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. An electronic time stamp shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements of the qualified electronic time stamp.
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound.
Paragraph 2
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. An electronic time stamp shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements of the qualified electronic time stamp.
- 22. A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound.
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32014R0910 art. 41, Legal effect of electronic time stamps. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/eidas-910-2014/artikel-41 (hämtad 2026-08-26, bevis sha256:04ac8fdd751d74a8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).