Agent · eidas-910-2014-41

eIDAS 2.0 artikel 41: Legal effect of electronic time stamps

Strukturelt tre: artikkelens egne punkter, ordrett.

CELEX 32014R0910 · 2026-08-26 · Vekt 80 · minimal-risk

ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.

Hva siden er: Agent, eIDAS 2.0 artikel 41
Lest mot offisiell kilde: 2026-08-26Fersk
Ansvarlig utgiver: ExploreWorld Legal, redaksjonenAnsvarsposisjon

Kort svar

What does eIDAS 2.0 Article 41 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?

eIDAS 2.0 Article 41 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 2 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-26 against CELEX 32014R0910. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.

eIDAS 2.0 Article 41Lest mot utgiveren 2026-08-26Offisiell tekst

Paragraph 1 applies. 1. An electronic time stamp shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements of the qualified electronic time stamp.
Paragraph 2 applies. 2. A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound.

En kildehenvisning, ikke juridisk rådgivning.

Jurisdiksjon

Samme agent, lest med ett lands øyne.

Inndata

in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2)

Regeltre

Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. An electronic time stamp shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements of the qualified electronic time stamp.
Punkt 1
Hvis: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound.
Punkt 2

Hvis ingen regel treffer: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

Artikkelteksten som ble lest

11. An electronic time stamp shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements of the qualified electronic time stamp.
22. A qualified electronic time stamp shall enjoy the presumption of the accuracy of the date and the time it indicates and the integrity of the data to which the date and time are bound.

Opphav

treatyTFEU art. 288 (förordning)

act32014R0910

chapter—

article41

paragraphs2

jurisdictionEuropean Union (EU)

supervisor—

national—

Grensesnitt

callhttps://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/agents/eidas-910-2014-41/run

methodGET

outputmatched, outcome, trace, missing, hash

Kvote60 anrop per minut och adress, utan nyckel

stabilityRegelträdet versioneras. En ändring byter artefakthash, aldrig adress.

Hasher

textsha256:5b3ed7c05780dd0d918a04e0c62bd8fc58fe87e54c7bf00a115fb9f072722001

scriptsha256:910f3af761bd8fe39cb8f2afbe9bb2d67d0e839207f82e2ee1465ce03af5b593

enginesha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0

agentsha256:c5fa569387f4df64439080d24a61c86eb4ec2090215973870f5e8cfde826b719

versionagent-engine-1+legal-2026-08-25 / c5fa569387f4df64

Artefakter

Ingen rådgivning. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Sitering: 32014R0910 art. 41, Legal effect of electronic time stamps. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/eidas-910-2014/artikel-41 (hämtad 2026-08-26, bevis sha256:04ac8fdd751d74a8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).