ExploreWorld Legal
10 985 court decisions, 1 563 EU law articles and 12 951 legal AI agents, sourced line by line
Swedish law, EU law and US federal regulation in one register: 50 statutes, 27 EU acts, 67 US rulebooks and 22 agency registers, read from the own publications of 18 court instances.
Final judgments, updated continuously, read straight from the court
A workspace for law firms, M&A and competition counsel, corporate lawyers, employment and property lawyers, tax and company law, family and migration, health and public law, EU finance and sustainability teams, and compliance officers. Every ruling points at the publishing court itself, every provision at the official publication, and every row carries a confidence level, official, mirror or derived, so a reader sees where the text actually comes from. Case law is read straight from the Swedish courts' own search service and now covers the full chain of instances, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Administrative Court, the courts of appeal, the administrative courts of appeal, the Labour Court, the Land and Environment Court of Appeal, the Patent and Market Court of Appeal and the Migration Court of Appeal. Add Swedish statutes, preparatory works and agency regulations, EU acts down to the article, implementation across six jurisdictions, US federal rules, decision tools, guides and sourced finance terms, all from one closed register. Frequent questions in employment and property law now have their own addresses, answered in the same six blocks with the provision on every line. Six fixed blocks per answer, one source per line, the same answer every time.
- Final judgments are ingested on a rolling basis from the courts' search service, every row against the court's own publication
- Case law from the Swedish courts' search service, with case numbers, ECLI and provisions
- Every row marked official, mirror or derived, with a content hash. No client data, nothing stored
Final judgments, latest ingested
- Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen · 2026-08-25Förhandsbesked om inkomstskattHFD mål nr 7493-25
- Migrationsöverdomstolen · 2026-06-24Det har vid prövning av en ansökan om uppehållstillstånd på grund av anknytning, bedömts finnas sådana särskilda skäl som innebär att…MIG 2026:9
- Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen · 2026-06-23Förhandsbesked om inkomstskattHFD mål nr 758-26
- Migrationsöverdomstolen · 2026-06-23När en migrationsdomstol inom ramen för en prövning enligt 12 kap. 18 § utlänningslagen bedömer att det finns en härledd uppehållsrätt…MIG 2026:8
- Högsta domstolen · 2026-06-16Det är i undantagsfall möjligt att förordna om umgänge med umgängesstöd för viss tid utan att samtidigt förordna om en övergång till ett…HDO mål nr Ö 3043-25
How it works
01
You ask in your own words
A question, a statute name or an SFS number. No document upload, no client data.
02
The register matches the rows
Statute, preparatory works, agency regulation, the EU act behind it, the article and the guiding decision.
03
You get six fixed blocks with sources
Every line carries its register, its fetch date and a deep link into the official text, plus a shareable answer id.
Legal question
Ask in your own words. You get the statute, the preparatory works, the agency regulations and the EU act behind them, each on its own line with a link to the official text.
- A source on every line, never a summary without one
- The same question gives the same answer, every time
- A shareable link with a content hash, ready for the file
The figure after each label is the number of source rows in the register, that is acts, regulations and rulebooks, not pages.
Industry
Role
Read the summary and the supervision first. It shows who reviews the company and what failure leads to.
Reading order for the role: 1. Legal question › 6. Audit trail › 5. Typical application › 3. Secondary sources
Competence area
Try the engine
Four hard questions
Start with your task
Litigation
Find support in a judgment
Search guiding decisions, see what became final and follow changes in the law.
In-house, deals
Map the rules in a transaction
Move from theme to act and on to the article that carries the duty.
Compliance
Assess the risk in a process
Risk scoring per legal area, with the sources behind every score.
Cross-border
Compare jurisdictions
One question, three legal orders, with article crosswalks between them.
Verification
Check source and proof
Read dates, version history and the citation chain behind each conclusion.
Engineering
Read us machine to machine
Open endpoints, datasets and the agent layer for your own workflows.
Deterministic
Blocks four and five are templates filled from the rows that matched. No sentence is written by a language model, and the engine version travels with every answer.
Traceable
Every row is ranked by its publisher: the court or the official gazette first, a mirror only when no official address exists, derived material marked as derived. Missing rows are printed as missing, never replaced by a plausible sentence.
European
Swedish statutes are tied to the EU act behind them, and the reading is handled inside the EU. No customer data, no document upload, no assessment of a matter.
Business value
What a firm, a bank and a partner get out of the surface
One register, five ways into the workflow: pick a sector, pick a role, follow the rule down into national law, read employment law across three legal systems, or read the same rows machine to machine.
Sector view, fewer dead ends
Banking, technology, energy, life science and more each have their own address with the right statutes, supervisors and typical questions already pulled. Counsel starts inside the matter, not in an empty search box.
See the sectorsRole view, the right reading order
Partner, in house counsel, compliance and internal audit read the same answer in the order their work demands, from the provision to the audit trail. A shorter path to a memo that holds in a board room.
See the rolesSix jurisdictions side by side
The implementation map shows which national law carries an EU article in SE, NO, DK, FI, DE and UK, with article level crosswalks between acts. Cross border questions get a first answer without local counsel.
Open the implementation mapTransactions and competition
Share transfers, due diligence, merger control and cartel law in one register with Swedish statutes, EU regulations and guiding decisions. Every row points to the official source, from SFS to EUR-Lex and the court's own publication.
Open transactions and competitionProperty law
Land code, expropriation act, planning and building act, tenancy and condominium law with workflows, decision tools and agency notes. A legal area that touches every individual, company and municipality.
Open property lawEmployment law, Sweden, EU and the US
LAS, MBL, the working time and whistleblowing directives, FLSA, Title VII, FMLA and WARN in one register, with decision tools for notice period, non compete clause, whistleblowing channel and leave. The one legal area every employer and every employee meets.
Open employment lawGuides, tools and question pages
Agency case handling orders written as workflows, decision tools for notice period, non compete, whistleblowing channel and leave, and question pages that answer what an employer and an employee actually ask. Every step with the provision, the agency note and a proof hash.
Open the guidesAPI, MCP and white label
The same rows are readable machine to machine, with register, fetch date and answer id, so your systems, agents and client portals cite exactly what the lawyer sees. White label surface for resellers.
Read the interfacesWho it is for
- Associates who need the statute, the preparatory work and the decision in one place.
- Partners who have to show a client where a position comes from.
- Compliance teams that need the same answer twice, a year apart.
- Transaction, competition, employment and property counsel who need the official source before writing the next line.
- Legal tech and resellers who want to deliver the engine under their own brand, via API or MCP.
AI Act specification
Built around transparency and human oversight
The legal reading engine is a limited-risk system under Regulation (EU) 2024/1689. No sentence is written by an AI agent, no external model is called in the answer, and no customer data leaves the reading path. The key provisions are published so a lawyer can read them in the source text.
No AI agent – answers are assembled from fixed register blocks, never by a language model.
No US AI services or cloud services in the reading path – only our own code against official data.
Official sources only – SFS, EU-Lex, HD/HFD and guiding decisions.
- Read AI Act Art. 5 – prohibited AI practices
- Read AI Act Art. 6 – high-risk classification
- Read AI Act Art. 50 – transparency for certain AI systems
- Read AI Act Art. 13 – information and documentation
What this is
A proof-carrying source engine, not a raw-data API for legal text
A raw-data API hands over a statute or a ruling and leaves everything else to the caller. This surface does the opposite: it answers with assembled material where every row carries its official publisher, its register, its reading date, its confidence level and its content hash, in six fixed blocks that look the same every time. The difference is not the volume of text, but that the answer can be substantiated, reproduced and cited without anyone re-reading the source afterwards.
Show less
What the platform is
- A source engine that assembles answers from a closed register, never from a model that guesses.
- A provenance chain: official publisher first, mirrors and derived rows marked as exactly that.
- A citation contract: answer number, content hash, engine version and a permanent address for every answer.
- A cross-jurisdiction coordinate system: Swedish law, EU acts down to the article, US federal rules and the implementation between them.
- A workspace built around how a matter is actually run, with the same content as an open API and as tooling for your own agents.
What it is not
- Not a document archive with a search box, and not a mirror of someone else's database.
- Not a chat that words the law itself: no sentence without a row behind it.
- Not advice and no assessment of an individual matter.
- Not a service that accepts client material, stores questions or trains models on what you write.
The difference from a raw-data API
| Question | Raw-data API | This surface |
|---|---|---|
| What is returned | A body of text from an archive | Assembled material in six fixed blocks |
| Where the row comes from | Usually a mirror, rarely stated | Publisher, register, reading date and confidence per row |
| Can the answer be reproduced | No, the text may have changed | Yes: answer number, content hash and engine version |
| When a source is missing | A silent gap | The gap is printed as missing |
| Who does the legal work | The caller, afterwards | The register carries the proof, the lawyer makes the call |
| Can an AI assistant cite it | Only with caveats | Yes, with source, date and a verifiable hash |
The category is new, so it is written out here in plain words: a proof-carrying source engine for legal material. Comparing it to a raw-data API is comparing it to an earlier link in the chain.
How the surface is used
From question to citable material, in six fixed blocks
This is a working tool for anyone who has to substantiate a position. You state a legal question in plain words or give a provision, and get back the statutes, preparatory works, agency regulations and guiding decisions registered for that question. The answer is assembled from register rows, not written by the service, and it looks the same the next time the question is asked.
1. The question is read
It is matched against area of law, provision and case number. A citation such as NJA or HFD opens the decision directly.
2. The sources are fetched
Every row comes from the closed source register with its SFS number, its register and a link to the official publication.
3. The answer is assembled
Six fixed blocks: legal question, primary sources, case law, application, limits and audit trail. A missing source is printed as missing.
4. The material travels
The answer can be copied as text with citations and the rule version, ready for a memo or a matter file.
Show less
What you get
- A shorter path from question to provision: statute, preparatory work and decision in one answer.
- A substantiated position: every sentence traces back to a row with a stated source.
- Reproducibility: the same question gives the same answer, with a version, a year later.
- European linkage: Swedish statutes are tied to the EU act behind them.
What it does not do
- No advice and no assessment of an individual matter.
- No uploaded documents, no client information and no storage of questions.
- No answer without a source: a printed gap rather than a plausible sentence.
The register, layer by layer
Eleven source layers, one register, the same citation every time
Every answer on this surface comes from the layers below. The figures are counted from the register as the page renders, so what you read is what is actually loaded, not what a brochure once promised.
- 134source rowsSwedish lawStatutes with their SFS number, agency regulations and the preparatory works behind them, each row with a fetch date and a link to the official publication.Open the layer
- 1563articlesEU law down to the articleGDPR, NIS2, DORA, MiCA, CSRD, the AI Act and the rest, read to the individual article with the official EUR-Lex text.Open the layer
- 77implementation cellsThe implementation mapWhich national law carries an EU article in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Germany and the UK, cell by cell with a named source.Open the layer
- 67rulesUS federal regulationSEC, CFTC, FinCEN, OCC, FTC and HHS with the rules a European group actually meets, tied to the matching EU requirement.Open the layer
Show less
- 10985decisionsGuiding decisionsPublished rulings of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Administrative Court, attached to the provision they interpret.Open the layer
- 27source rowsEmployment law across three legal systemsLAS, MBL and the Discrimination Act, the working time and whistleblowing directives, FLSA, Title VII, FMLA and WARN, with Labour Court rulings.Open the layer
- 4toolsDecision toolsNotice period, non compete, whistleblowing channel and leave, step by step with the provision, the agency note and a proof hash in the result.Open the layer
- 36questionsQuestion pagesThe questions employers and employees actually ask, answered in six fixed blocks with the source row and both positions set out separately.Open the layer
- 12questionsSmall business questionsThe questions sole traders and companies with few employees actually ask, from F-tax and the VAT threshold to audit duty and forms of employment, answered against the provision at the publisher.Open the layer
- 3guidesGuides and process flowsThe agencies' own case handling orders written as workflows, from filing to decision, in steps you can cite in a memo.Open the layer
- 100termsFinancial termsThe vocabulary that ties regulation to the business, from capital requirements and credit risk to sustainability reporting, defined against a source.Open the layer
The same rows are readable machine to machine over API and MCP, with register, fetch date and answer id, so your systems cite exactly what the lawyer sees. 6 jurisdictions in the implementation map.
Live demo
Pick a question and read the answer the engine returns right now. The rows come from the register, not from this page.
Legal question
Which preparatory works sit behind Dataskyddslagen?
Primary sources
Statute
SFS 2018:218 — Lag med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s dataskyddsförordning
Swedish Code of Statutes, the Riksdag
Preparatory work
Prop. 2017/18:105 — Ny dataskyddslag
Riksdag document register
Preparatory work
SOU 2017:39 — Ny dataskyddslag
Riksdag document register
- Dataskyddslagen carries the identifier SFS 2018:218 and entered into force on 2018-05-25.
- Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten is the authority named for supervision and regulations under Dataskyddslagen.
- Dataskyddslagen: Kompletterar förordning (EU) 2016/679.
Audit trail
- 1. Swedish Code of Statutes, the Riksdag · SFS 2018:218
- 2. Riksdag document register · Prop. 2017/18:105
- 3. Riksdag document register · SOU 2017:39
- 4. Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten, regulatory collection · DIFS 2018:2
Engine version: legal-answer/1.1.0
Open the full answerThe demo runs the same engine as the search field above. Nothing is stored.
Verifiable facts
These are the facts a reviewer asks for before a reading surface enters the workflow. Every row can be checked on the spot, on a published page or in a machine-readable file.
- Register updated
- 2026-08-25
- Build
- legal-2026-08-25
- Engine version
- legal-answer/1.1.0
- Case law read
- 2026-08-29
- Data processing
- Inside the EU, no third country transfer
- Client data
- Not accepted, not stored
- Machine access
- Open API and MCP, the same rows as in the browser
- Deviation in a source row
- Reported to the publisher, corrected in the register and written into the version history
Check for yourselfAudit and methodAPI and MCPAI disclosure, machine-readable
Mobile
Put the source library on your home screen
Scan the code or add the page from your browser menu. It opens in its own full screen window and always reads the live registry, never a copy.
Scan with the phone camera
On your own phone you cannot scan your own screen, therefore save the code or share the link to another device.
Or type the address
legal.exploreworldai.com
iPhone and iPad, Safari
- 1Tap the share icon
- 2Choose Add to Home Screen
- 3Confirm the name and tap Add
Android, Chrome
- 1Open the browser menu
- 2Choose Install app or Add to home screen
- 3Confirm
Why this is safe
- No app store account, no installer file, no APK
- The dialog you see is your own browser's, not ours
- Same address, same sources and same citations as on desktop
- Remove it like any icon, nothing stays behind on the phone
The register
Statutes read against the Riksdag document register and the responsible authority's own regulatory collection.
Data protection
Cybersecurity
Financial markets
Tax and tax procedure
Consumer law
Company law and accounting
Employment law
Public procurement
Marketing law
Transactions and competition
Family and migration
Health and life science
Case law
Guiding decisions from the Swedish courts, read from the courts' own service Search case law: the Supreme Court, the Supreme Administrative Court, the courts of appeal, the administrative courts of appeal, the Labour Court, the Migration Court of Appeal, the Land and Environment Court of Appeal and the Patent and Market Court of Appeal. Every decision is tied to the statute it applies. The headnote is the one published in the source; no sentence is written by a model.
Case law read on 2026-08-29. · 10985
Case lawWhat the engine never does
- No customer data, no document extraction, no agent logic.
- No free text: blocks four and five are templates filled from the rows that matched.
- No legal advice, no risk assessment, no assessment of an individual matter.
- Same question, same answer, with the engine version on every result.
Verifiable trust signals
- Six fixed blocks, one source per line
- No sentence written by a language model
- Engine version and read date on every answer
- No customer data, no documents, no advice
- Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act
Next step
See the engine on your own questions
We take three questions from your daily work, show the source chain behind every answer and hand over the answer links with their content hash so you can reopen them. Thirty minutes, and you send us no material.