NJA 2020 s. 858
Bestämmande av sanktionsavgift vid marknadsmanipulation. (I-III)
Bestämmande av sanktionsavgift vid marknadsmanipulation. (I-III)
The decision in three points
What happened
Bestämmande av sanktionsavgift vid marknadsmanipulation. (I-III)
Why it matters
Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden, 2020. Applies Marknadsmissbrukslagen.
Risk profile of the decision
MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.
- Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden
- Applies one statute
The decision in context
The decision is used in questions about financial markets.
Relations of the decision in the graph
Statutes (1)
- MarknadsmissbrukslagenSFS 2016:1306
Questions (0)
Decisions (3)
- NJA 2022 s. 730SFS 2016:1306
- HFD 2022 ref. 23SFS 2016:1306
- HFD 2019 ref. 72SFS 2016:1306
Agent commands
- runCaseSummary()
The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.
- runLegalImpact()
Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.
- runObligationCheck()
Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.
- runProofVerify()
Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.
https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2020-s-858/manifest.json
- Court
- Supreme Court of Sweden
- Decided
- 2020-11-11
- Applies
- 1
Mål nr B 586-20, B 6660-19, B 2458-20
- 5 kap. 15 §, 16 § och 18 § lagen (2016:1306)
Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.
Statutes
- Marknadsmissbrukslagen
SFS 2016:1306 · Financial markets
Case law
- I en sådan situation ska 35 kap. 1 § brottsbalken inte tillämpas analogt
NJA 2022 s. 730Supreme Court of Sweden
I en sådan situation ska 35 kap. 1 § brottsbalken inte tillämpas analogt
- Om det finns skäl att avstå från ingripande genom beslut om sanktionsavgift enligt lagen med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s…
HFD 2022 ref. 23Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
- Om ingripande enligt lagen med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s marknadsmissbruksförordning när en anmälan om en transaktion, som…
HFD 2019 ref. 72Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
Case law read on 2026-08-29.
Change monitoring
The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| Publisher | Sveriges Domstolar |
| Last read | 2026-08-29 |
| Interval | Every 30 days |
| Next re-read | 2026-09-28 |
| Status | Checked against the publisher |
Row history
Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-29 | Row read against the courts' own register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| 2020-11-11 | Date of decision according to Högsta domstolen | Högsta domstolen |
| 2017-02-01 | Applied statute in force: SFS 2016:1306 | Sveriges riksdag |
Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.
Cite this row
The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.
NJA 2020 s. 858, Bestämmande av sanktionsavgift vid marknadsmanipulation. (I-III). ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2020-s-858 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:aa9d6668707cbae8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).
- sha256:
- aa9d6668707cbae8d0f3d56417f9b349b64cd8ea59cf193146ef8f68730864b7
- hämtad:
- 2026-08-25
- source_confidence:
- official
- bygge:
- legal-2026-08-25
Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.
The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.