Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

NovaCopilot's registers are reviewed daily against official sources

HFD 2019 ref. 72

HFD 2019 ref. 72, Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden (2019)

Judgment of Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden, 2019. Statutes applied: Lag med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s marknadsmissbruksförordning. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Fråga om ingripande enligt lagen med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s marknadsmissbruksförordning när en anmälan om en transaktion, som skulle ha gjorts senast tredje affärsdagen efter det att transaktionen genomfördes, gjorts efter denna dag men före den fjärde affärsdagen.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Fråga om ingripande enligt lagen med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s marknadsmissbruksförordning när en anmälan om en transaktion, som skulle ha gjorts senast tredje affärsdagen efter det att transaktionen genomfördes, gjorts efter denna dag men före den fjärde affärsdagen.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden, 2019. Applies Marknadsmissbrukslagen.

Risk profile of the decision

MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
  • Applies one statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about financial markets.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (3)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/hfd-2019-72/manifest.json

    NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

    NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

    Common questions

    What compensation do I get for a delayed flight in the EU?How long can I return an online purchase in the EU?Can I ask a company to delete my personal data?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

    Source: NovaCopilot

    NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

    Court
    Supreme Administrative Court of Sweden
    Decided
    2019-12-20
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr 610-19

    Also searched as: HFD 2019 ref 72, HFD 2019:72, HFD 2019 72, Högsta förvaltningsdomstolens årsbok 2019 ref 72, Swedish judgment HFD 2019 ref 72, Case HFD 2019 ref. 72, HFD 2019 ref. 72 2019, 610-19.

    • 5 kap. 2 §, 15 §, 17 § och 18 § lagen (2016:1306) med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s marknadsmissbruksförordning
    Hämta hela domen

    Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

    Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Verified, unchanged

    Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20

    See the open quality meter

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-09-05.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-09-05
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-10-05
    StatusRe-read scheduled
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2019-12-20Date of decision according to Högsta förvaltningsdomstolenHögsta förvaltningsdomstolen
    2017-02-01Applied statute in force: SFS 2016:1306Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    What changed this week, every Monday

    A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

    Topics

    Cite this row

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    HFD 2019 ref. 72, Fråga om ingripande enligt lagen med kompletterande bestämmelser till EU:s marknadsmissbruksförordning när en anmälan om en transaktion, som skulle ha gjorts senast tredje affärsdagen efter det att transaktionen genomfördes, gjorts efter denna dag men före den fjärde affärsdagen.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/hfd-2019-72 (hämtad 2026-10-18, bevis sha256:91f8d5a44afdede7, bygge legal-2026-10-18).

    Machine addressHow to cite the platform
    sha256:
    91f8d5a44afdede7e8b1fc4a4e3d89640233c8351c4609f3ff61fca48ff6e2f2
    hämtad:
    2026-10-18
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-10-18
    officiell källa:
    https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/b8301994-36ff-401b-ab8a-9e177d159aba

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.