Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

AD 1996 nr 102

AD 1996 nr 102, Swedish Labour Court (1996)

Judgment of Swedish Labour Court, 1996. Statutes applied: Lag om anställningsskydd. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Fråga om det har förelegat saklig grund för uppsägning av en syo-konsulent vid en kommuns gymnasieskola. Som grund för uppsägningen har åberopats långvarig misskötsamhet i form av bl.a. olovlig frånvaro, dåliga arbetsprestationer och underlåtenhet att iaktta arbetstiderna. Arbetsdomstolen finner att den misskötsamhet som styrkts i målet inte har varit av sådant slag att kommunen har haft rätt att skilja syo-konsulenten från anställningen.

Share this page

Core question

Fråga om det har förelegat saklig grund för uppsägning av en syo-konsulent vid en kommuns gymnasieskola

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Som grund för uppsägningen har åberopats långvarig misskötsamhet i form av bl.a. olovlig frånvaro, dåliga arbetsprestationer och underlåtenhet att iaktta arbetstiderna.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Swedish Labour Court, 1996. Applies LAS.

Related questions

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Swedish Labour Court
  • Applies one statute
  • 741 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about employment law, and 6 question pages in the register rest on the same statute.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Decisions (8)

Agent commands

  • runCaseSummary()

    The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

  • runLegalImpact()

    Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

  • runObligationCheck()

    Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

  • runProofVerify()

    Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-1996-102/manifest.json

NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

Common questions

What requirements apply to data processors?When must a personal data breach be reported?What does the AI Act require for AI features in our service?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

Source: NovaCopilot

NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

Court
Swedish Labour Court
Decided
1996-09-18
Applies
1

Mål nr A 197-95

Also searched as: AD 1996:102, AD 1996 102, Arbetsdomstolens domar 1996 nr 102, Swedish judgment AD 1996 nr 102, Case AD 1996 nr 102, AD 1996 nr 102 1996, A 197-95, Case A 197-95.

  • 7 § lagen (1982:80) om anställningsskydd
Hämta hela domen

Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

Arbetsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

Fresh

Checked against the publisher 2026-11-04 · Next check 2026-12-04

See the open quality meter

Statutes

  • LAS

    SFS 1982:80 · Employment law

Case law

Case law read on 2026-11-04.

Change monitoring

The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

Change monitoring
FieldValue
RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
PublisherSveriges Domstolar
Last read2026-11-04
IntervalEvery 30 days
Next re-read2026-12-04
StatusChecked against the publisher
Open the register at the publisher

Row history

Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

Row history
DateEventSource
2026-11-04Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
1996-09-18Date of decision according to ArbetsdomstolenArbetsdomstolen
1982-07-01Applied statute in force: SFS 1982:80Sveriges riksdag

Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

What changed this week, every Monday

A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

Topics

Cite this row

The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

AD 1996 nr 102, Fråga om det har förelegat saklig grund för uppsägning av en syo-konsulent vid en kommuns gymnasieskola. Som grund för uppsägningen har åberopats långvarig misskötsamhet i form av bl.a. olovlig frånvaro, dåliga arbetsprestationer och underlåtenhet att iaktta arbetstiderna. Arbetsdomstolen finner att den misskötsamhet som styrkts i målet inte har varit av sådant slag att kommunen har haft rätt att skilja syo-konsulenten från anställningen.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-1996-102 (hämtad 2026-11-05, bevis sha256:437e9b61cb1e8c23, bygge legal-2026-11-05).

Machine addressHow to cite the platform
sha256:
437e9b61cb1e8c2313c4efccfb495d8b78e30d264f39aa362170cf0ca6c267b9
hämtad:
2026-11-05
source_confidence:
official
bygge:
legal-2026-11-05
officiell källa:
https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/c0c3aad1-8311-427b-8049-f66783a10d06

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Arbetsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.