Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

How does US at-will employment differ from Swedish job protection?

In the US, employment is as a rule at-will under state law, dismissal may occur without a stated reason but never on a prohibited ground under federal law. In Sweden, objective grounds are required for every dismissal by the employer.

What the source says

  • Section 7 of the Employment Protection Act: dismissal by the employer must rest on objective grounds.
  • 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2: employment decisions may not be based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin.
  • 29 U.S.C. §2102 WARN Act: sixty days of notice for larger closings or mass layoffs.

Source rows

For the employer · How the employer puts the question

A group with units in both jurisdictions cannot reuse a US dismissal process in Sweden, the base requirement differs at the root.

For the employee · How the employee puts the question

At-will does not mean unprotected: prohibited grounds, notification rules and collective rights still apply federally.

Leading rulings

  • Bostock v. Clayton County, 590 U.S. 644 (2020)
    Supreme Court of the United States · 2020-06-15

    An employer who fires someone for being homosexual or transgender discriminates because of sex.

    Official source
  • Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 U.S. 497 (2018)
    Supreme Court of the United States · 2018-05-21

    Agreements for individualised arbitration are to be enforced under the Federal Arbitration Act.

    Official source

Next step

Set the Swedish rule against Title VII and the WARN Act in the register before writing a global policy.

All questions

The rows reproduce what the source says. They are not legal advice, and applying them to a specific case is the reader's or their counsel's decision.

/arbetsratt/fragor/at-will-employment-jamfort-med-las

Next step

Three ways to put the register to work in your own practice.

Start with your task