What rules apply to AI in hiring in the United States?
There is no single federal AI hiring statute. Duties come from state and city law on notice, consent and bias auditing, while the federal question stays what it has always been: whether the outcome discriminates.
The answer differs between the federal level and the states, see the rows below.
The answer by level
Illinois
Illinois requires notice and consent before an artificial intelligence analysis of a video interview, and reporting of demographic data where AI alone screens applicants.
775 ILCS 5/2-102Colorado
Colorado places duties of care, disclosure and impact assessment on developers and deployers of high risk AI systems, and employment decisions are named as high risk.
Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1701 et seq.New York City
New York City requires an annual independent bias audit of an automated employment decision tool, publication of the results and notice to candidates.
NYC Admin. Code §§ 20-870 to 20-874, Local Law 144Federal level
At federal level the prohibition of discrimination applies to the outcome, so a selection tool that disadvantages a protected group is judged under the same standard as any other practice.
42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, 29 CFR Parts 1600 to 1614
Source lines
- Illinois requires notice and consent before AI analysis of a video interview and reporting where AI alone screens applicants.
- Colorado imposes duties of care, disclosure and impact assessment on high risk AI systems, naming employment decisions as high risk.
- New York City requires an annual independent bias audit of an automated employment decision tool, with published results and candidate notice.
What it means for the company
Keep the audit, the notice text and the vendor documentation together per tool, because each jurisdiction asks for the same evidence in a different form.
| Level | Requirement | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Illinois | Illinois requires notice and consent before an artificial intelligence analysis of a video interview, and reporting of demographic data where AI alone screens applicants. | 775 ILCS 5/2-102 |
| Colorado | Colorado places duties of care, disclosure and impact assessment on developers and deployers of high risk AI systems, and employment decisions are named as high risk. | Colo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1701 et seq. |
| New York City | New York City requires an annual independent bias audit of an automated employment decision tool, publication of the results and notice to candidates. | NYC Admin. Code §§ 20-870 to 20-874, Local Law 144 |
| Federal level | At federal level the prohibition of discrimination applies to the outcome, so a selection tool that disadvantages a protected group is judged under the same standard as any other practice. | 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, 29 CFR Parts 1600 to 1614 |
What it means for the individual
You are entitled to be told when a tool takes part in the decision, and in New York City the audit result is public.
Source lines
- Illinois Human Rights Act, artificial intelligence in employment decisions775 ILCS 5/2-102 · read 2026-08-25 · proof 42f43073bb62c250
- Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act, consumer protections in high-risk AIColo. Rev. Stat. § 6-1-1701 et seq. · read 2026-08-25 · proof 42f43073bb62c250
- Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII on equal employment opportunity42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, 29 CFR Parts 1600 to 1614 · read 2026-08-25 · proof 42f43073bb62c250
- NYC Department of Consumer and Worker ProtectionNYC Admin. Code §§ 20-870 to 20-874, Local Law 144 · read 2026-08-25 · proof 42f43073bb62c250Official source
Next step
List every tool used in screening, match it to the states and cities where candidates apply, and schedule the audits before the next hiring round.
This page reports what the sources say, with the identifier and address of the publisher. It is not legal advice and does not decide an individual matter.
Next step
Three ways to put the register to work in your own practice.
Start with your task
Litigation
Find support in a judgment
Search guiding decisions, see what became final and follow changes in the law.
In-house, deals
Map the rules in a transaction
Move from theme to act and on to the article that carries the duty.
Compliance
Assess the risk in a process
Risk scoring per legal area, with the sources behind every score.