EU regulatory register · DSA
Article 35Mitigation of risks
CELEX 32022R2065 · Read on 2026-08-18 · Chapter III
Short answer
1. Providers of very large online platforms and of very large online search engines shall put in place reasonable, proportionate and effective mitigation measures, tailored to the specific systemic risks identified pursuant to Article 34, with particular consideration to the impacts of such measures on fundamental rights.
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/dsa-2022-2065/artikel-35 · Short answer as data · Official text
DSA, Digital Services Act in short
Platforms must accept notices of illegal content, give reasons for decisions, offer complaints and be transparent about moderation and ads.
- What must a statement of reasons under Article 17 contain?
- What is a trusted flagger?
- Does the DSA apply to small companies?
Source: NovaCopilot
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. Providers of very large online platforms and of very large online search engines shall put in place reasonable, proportionate and effective mitigation measures, tailored to the specific systemic risks identified pursuant to Article 34, with particular consideration to the impacts of such measures on fundamental rights. Such measures may include, where applicable:
(a)
adapting the design, features or functioning of their services, including their online interfaces;
(b)
adapting their terms and conditions and their enforcement;
(c)
adapting content moderation processes, including the speed and quality of processing notices related to specific types of illegal content and, where appropriate, the expeditious removal of, or the disabling of access to, the content notified, in particular in respect of illegal hate speech or cyber violence, as well as adapting any relevant decision-making processes and dedicated resources for content moderation;
(d)
testing and adapting their algorithmic systems, including their recommender systems;
(e)
adapting their advertising systems and adopting targeted measures aimed at limiting or adjusting the presentation of advertisements in association with the service they provide;
(f)
reinforcing the internal processes, resources, testing, documentation, or supervision of any of their activities in particular as regards detection of systemic risk;
(g)
The article continues in the official text.
Follow-up questions
Other articles in this chapter
Knowledge card
- Applies
- very-large-platform: Put mitigation measures in place for identified systemic risks.
- Risk if ignored
- critical
- What to do
- Put mitigation measures in place for identified systemic risks.
- Deadline
- No fixed deadline in the register
card:eu:article:dsa--art-35 · sha256 d88a0d3ef7a4 · Source: NovaCopilot
Risk, sanction and outcome
Art. 35 · very-large-platform
Risk: high · Sanction: administrative_fine · Authority: National competent authority (Digital Services Coordinator)
Decisions applying the provision: none in the register
Full chain (JSON)
Outcomes are counted from stored judgments that cite the provision verbatim. Source: NovaCopilot
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit