Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · DSA

Article 34Risk assessment

CELEX 32022R2065 · Read on 2026-08-18 · Chapter III

Share this page

Short answer

1. Providers of very large online platforms and of very large online search engines shall diligently identify, analyse and assess any systemic risks in the Union stemming from the design or functioning of their service and its related systems, including algorithmic systems, or from the use made of their services.

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/dsa-2022-2065/artikel-34 · Short answer as data · Official text

DSA, Digital Services Act in short

Platforms must accept notices of illegal content, give reasons for decisions, offer complaints and be transparent about moderation and ads.

Source: NovaCopilot

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. Providers of very large online platforms and of very large online search engines shall diligently identify, analyse and assess any systemic risks in the Union stemming from the design or functioning of their service and its related systems, including algorithmic systems, or from the use made of their services.

They shall carry out the risk assessments by the date of application referred to in Article 33(6), second subparagraph, and at least once every year thereafter, and in any event prior to deploying functionalities that are likely to have a critical impact on the risks identified pursuant to this Article. This risk assessment shall be specific to their services and proportionate to the systemic risks, taking into consideration their severity and probability, and shall include the following systemic risks:

(a)

the dissemination of illegal content through their services;

(b)

any actual or foreseeable negative effects for the exercise of fundamental rights, in particular the fundamental rights to human dignity enshrined in Article 1 of the Charter, to respect for private and family life enshrined in Article 7 of the Charter, to the protection of personal data enshrined in Article 8 of the Charter, to freedom of expression and information, including the freedom and pluralism of the media, enshrined in Article 11 of the Charter, to non-discrimination enshrined in Article 21 of the Charter, to respect for the rights of the child enshrined in Article 24 of the Charter and to a high-level of consumer protection enshrined in Article 38 of the Charter;

(c)

any actual or foreseeable negative effects on civic discourse and electoral processes, and public security;

(d)

any actual or foreseeable negative effects in relation to gender-based violence, the protection of public health and minors and serious negative consequences to the person’s physical and mental well-being.

2. When conducting risk assessments, providers of very large online platforms and of very large online search engines shall take into account, in particular, whether and how the following factors influence any of the systemic risks referred to in paragraph 1:

(a)

the design of their recommender systems and any other relevant algorithmic system;

(b)

The article continues in the official text.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

Other articles in this chapter

Knowledge card

Applies
very-large-platform: Assess systemic risks stemming from the service.
Risk if ignored
critical
What to do
Assess systemic risks stemming from the service.
Deadline
No fixed deadline in the register

card:eu:article:dsa--art-34 · sha256 4b1639b02a7d · Source: NovaCopilot

Risk, sanction and outcome

  • Art. 34 · very-large-platform

    Risk: high · Sanction: administrative_fine · Authority: National competent authority (Digital Services Coordinator)

    Decisions applying the provision: none in the register

    Full chain (JSON)

Outcomes are counted from stored judgments that cite the provision verbatim. Source: NovaCopilot

Judgments of the Court of Justice

1 decisions

  • C-517/23Court of Justice of the European Union

    Apothekerkammer Nordrhein v DocMorris NV

    Reference for a preliminary ruling – Medicinal products for human use – Directive 2001/83/EC – Article 86(1) – Concept of ‘advertising of medicinal products’ – Article 87(3) – Advertising of prescription-only medicinal products – Advertising of a pharmacy’s entire range of medicinal products – Vouchers corresponding to a certain sum of money or a percentage reduction for the subsequent purchase of other products – Price reductions and payments with immediate effect – Free movement of goods – Article 34 TFEU – Freedom to provide services – Electronic commerce – Directive 2000/31/EC – Article 3(2) and (4)(a) – Restriction – Justification – Consumer protection.

    Ask NovaCopilot

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit