Agent · eidas-910-2014-32
eIDAS 2.0 artikel 32: Requirements for the validation of qualified electronic signatures
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
CELEX 32014R0910 · 2026-08-26 · Weight 80 · minimal-risk
ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.
- What this page is
- Agent, eIDAS 2.0 artikel 32
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-26Current
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does eIDAS 2.0 Article 32 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
eIDAS 2.0 Article 32 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 12 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-26 against CELEX 32014R0910. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
eIDAS 2.0 Article 32Checked against the publisher 2026-08-26Official text
- Paragraph 1 applies. the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I;
- Paragraph 2 applies. the qualified certificate was issued by a qualified trust service provider and was valid at the time of signing;
- Paragraph 3 applies. the signature validation data corresponds to the data provided to the relying party;
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I;
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
the qualified certificate was issued by a qualified trust service provider and was valid at the time of signing;
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
the signature validation data corresponds to the data provided to the relying party;
Paragraph 3
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)
Paragraph 4 applies
the unique set of data representing the signatory in the certificate is correctly provided to the relying party;
Paragraph 4
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)
Paragraph 5 applies
the use of any pseudonym is clearly indicated to the relying party if a pseudonym was used at the time of signing;
Paragraph 5
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 6)
Paragraph 6 applies
the electronic signature was created by a qualified electronic signature creation device;
Paragraph 6
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 7)
Paragraph 7 applies
the integrity of the signed data has not been compromised;
Paragraph 7
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 8)
Paragraph 8 applies
the requirements provided for in Article 26 were met at the time of signing.
Paragraph 8
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 9)
Paragraph 9 applies
Compliance with the requirements laid down in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall be presumed where the validation of qualified electronic signatures complies with the standards, specifications and procedures referred to in paragraph 3.
Paragraph 9
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 10)
Paragraph 10 applies
1. The process for the validation of a qualified electronic signature shall confirm the validity of a qualified electronic signature provided that: (a) the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I;
Paragraph 10
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 11)
Paragraph 11 applies
2. The system used for validating the qualified electronic signature shall provide to the relying party the correct result of the validation process and shall allow the relying party to detect any security relevant issues.
Paragraph 11
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 12)
Paragraph 12 applies
3. By 21 May 2025, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the validation of qualified electronic signatures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Paragraph 12
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 1the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I;
- 2the qualified certificate was issued by a qualified trust service provider and was valid at the time of signing;
- 3the signature validation data corresponds to the data provided to the relying party;
- 4the unique set of data representing the signatory in the certificate is correctly provided to the relying party;
- 5the use of any pseudonym is clearly indicated to the relying party if a pseudonym was used at the time of signing;
- 6the electronic signature was created by a qualified electronic signature creation device;
- 7the integrity of the signed data has not been compromised;
- 8the requirements provided for in Article 26 were met at the time of signing.
- 9Compliance with the requirements laid down in the first subparagraph of this paragraph shall be presumed where the validation of qualified electronic signatures complies with the standards, specifications and procedures referred to in paragraph 3.
- 101. The process for the validation of a qualified electronic signature shall confirm the validity of a qualified electronic signature provided that: (a) the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I;
- 112. The system used for validating the qualified electronic signature shall provide to the relying party the correct result of the validation process and shall allow the relying party to detect any security relevant issues.
- 123. By 21 May 2025, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the validation of qualified electronic signatures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32014R0910 art. 32, Requirements for the validation of qualified electronic signatures. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/eidas-910-2014/artikel-32 (hämtad 2026-08-26, bevis sha256:fa276af19c9b24d6, bygge legal-2026-08-25).