Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Agent · eidas-910-2014-32a

eIDAS 2.0 artikel 32a: Requirements for the validation of advanced electronic signatures based on qualified certificates

What is an agent? Agents execute decisions.

Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.

Also searched as: eIDAS Regulation article 32a · electronic identification article 32a · Regulation (EU) 2014/910 article 32a

CELEX 32014R0910 · 2026-08-26 · Weight 80 · minimal-risk

ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.

eIDAS 2.0Official source

What this page is
Agent, eIDAS 2.0 artikel 32a
Checked against the official source
2026-08-26Expired
Responsible publisher
ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position

NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

Source: NovaCopilot

Jurisdiction

The same agent, read through one country's lens.

Inputs

  • in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
  • punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10)

Rule tree

  1. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)

    Paragraph 1 applies

    the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I;

    Paragraph 1

  2. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)

    Paragraph 2 applies

    the qualified certificate was issued by a qualified trust service provider and was valid at the time of signing;

    Paragraph 2

  3. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)

    Paragraph 3 applies

    the signature validation data corresponds to the data provided to the relying party;

    Paragraph 3

  4. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)

    Paragraph 4 applies

    the unique set of data representing the signatory in the certificate is correctly provided to the relying party;

    Paragraph 4

  5. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)

    Paragraph 5 applies

    the use of any pseudonym is clearly indicated to the relying party if a pseudonym was used at the time of signing;

    Paragraph 5

  6. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 6)

    Paragraph 6 applies

    the integrity of the signed data has not been compromised;

    Paragraph 6

  7. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 7)

    Paragraph 7 applies

    the requirements provided for in Article 26 were met at the time of signing.

    Paragraph 7

  8. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 8)

    Paragraph 8 applies

    1. The process for the validation of an advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate shall confirm the validity of an advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate, provided that: (a) the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I;

    Paragraph 8

  9. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 9)

    Paragraph 9 applies

    2. The system used for validating the advanced electronic signature based on qualified certificate shall provide to the relying party the correct result of the validation process and shall allow the relying party to detect any security relevant issues.

    Paragraph 9

  10. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 10)

    Paragraph 10 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses

    3. By 21 May 2025, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the validation of advanced electronic signatures based on qualified certificates. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be presumed where the validation of advanced electronic signature based on quali…

    Paragraph 10

If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

The article text as read

  1. 1the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I;
  2. 2the qualified certificate was issued by a qualified trust service provider and was valid at the time of signing;
  3. 3the signature validation data corresponds to the data provided to the relying party;
  4. 4the unique set of data representing the signatory in the certificate is correctly provided to the relying party;
  5. 5the use of any pseudonym is clearly indicated to the relying party if a pseudonym was used at the time of signing;
  6. 6the integrity of the signed data has not been compromised;
  7. 7the requirements provided for in Article 26 were met at the time of signing.
  8. 81. The process for the validation of an advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate shall confirm the validity of an advanced electronic signature based on a qualified certificate, provided that: (a) the certificate that supports the signature was, at the time of signing, a qualified certificate for electronic signature complying with Annex I;
  9. 92. The system used for validating the advanced electronic signature based on qualified certificate shall provide to the relying party the correct result of the validation process and shall allow the relying party to detect any security relevant issues.
  10. 103. By 21 May 2025, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the validation of advanced electronic signatures based on qualified certificates. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 of this Article shall be presumed where the validation of advanced electronic signature based on qualified certificates complies with those standards, specifications and procedures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Lineage

treatyTFEU art. 288 (förordning)
act32014R0910
chapter-
article32a
paragraphs10
jurisdictionEuropean Union (EU)
supervisor-
national-

Interface

callhttps://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/agents/eidas-910-2014-32a/run
methodGET
outputmatched, outcome, trace, missing, hash
Quota60 anrop per minut och adress, utan nyckel
stabilityRegelträdet versioneras. En ändring byter artefakthash, aldrig adress.

Hashes

textsha256:6e6531969cf5ace38672e58e27310b7407c078fb1fbeb78cbf266c6d0c2f9c40
scriptsha256:247579277219cd3e260bdb577ca1bed7b312dfc8c19432040182f2d10071c64c
enginesha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0
agentsha256:def2d6fe47000c3a0a53b03a139be90479cca07ba48380ca404a597f35d823ac
versionagent-engine-1+legal-2026-11-01 / def2d6fe47000c3a

Artefacts

No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Citation: 32014R0910 art. 32a, Requirements for the validation of advanced electronic signatures based on qualified certificates. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/eidas-910-2014/artikel-32a (hämtad 2026-08-26, bevis sha256:a33bf5aec643c0d5, bygge legal-2026-11-01).