Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

RH 2002:84

RH 2002:84, Hovrätten för Övre Norrland (2002)

Judgment of Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 2002. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Brott mot alkohollagen (1994:1738). - Referat nr 13 av totalt 13 hovrättsdomar som har meddelats under 2002 (referat RH 2002:72-84). Under år 2002 har hovrätterna för summariska referat skickat in domar som avser brott mot alkohollagen och domar där påföljden bestämts till sluten ungdomsvård. Redovisningen upptar inte alla domar inom de angivna ämnesområdena utan får närmast ses som en exemplifiering av rättstillämpningen. Domstolarnas motiveringar återges inte ordagrant utan redovisas i de flesta fallen i sammanfattning. Samtliga domar har vunnit laga kraft. Skiljaktiga meningar redovisas inte.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Brott mot alkohollagen (1994:1738). - Referat nr 13 av totalt 13 hovrättsdomar som har meddelats under 2002 (referat RH 2002:72-84).

  2. Why it matters

    Decision by Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, 2002.

Risk profile of the decision

LowThe decision carries little weight when relied upon alone. Read it together with the statute and later decisions.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (0)

    Questions (0)

      Decisions (4)

      Agent commands

      • runCaseSummary()

        The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

      • runLegalImpact()

        Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

      • runObligationCheck()

        Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

      • runProofVerify()

        Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

      https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2002-84/manifest.json

      NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

      NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

      Source: NovaCopilot

      NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

      Court
      Hovrätten för Övre Norrland
      Decided
      2002-09-10
      Applies
      0

      Mål nr B 72-02

      Also searched as: RH 2002 84, Rättsfall från hovrätterna 2002:84, Swedish judgment RH 2002:84, Case RH 2002:84, RH 2002:84 2002, B 72-02, Case B 72-02.

      Hämta hela domen

      Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

      Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, Sveriges Domstolar

      Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

      Re-read scheduled

      Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20

      See the open quality meter

      Statutes

        Case law read on 2026-09-05.

        Change monitoring

        The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

        Change monitoring
        FieldValue
        RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        PublisherSveriges Domstolar
        Last read2026-09-05
        IntervalEvery 30 days
        Next re-read2026-10-05
        StatusRe-read scheduled
        Open the register at the publisher

        Row history

        Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

        Row history
        DateEventSource
        2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        2002-09-10Date of decision according to Hovrätten för Övre NorrlandHovrätten för Övre Norrland

        Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

        What changed this week, every Monday

        A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

        Topics

        The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

        RH 2002:84, Brott mot alkohollagen (1994:1738). - Referat nr 13 av totalt 13 hovrättsdomar som har meddelats under 2002 (referat RH 2002:72-84). Under år 2002 har hovrätterna för summariska referat skickat in domar som avser brott mot alkohollagen och domar där påföljden bestämts till sluten ungdomsvård. Redovisningen upptar inte alla domar inom de angivna ämnesområdena utan får närmast ses som en exemplifiering av rättstillämpningen. Domstolarnas motiveringar återges inte ordagrant utan redovisas i de flesta fallen i sammanfattning. Samtliga domar har vunnit laga kraft. Skiljaktiga meningar redovisas inte.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2002-84 (hämtad 2026-10-25, bevis sha256:de07e83837e1d8de, bygge legal-2026-10-25).

        sha256:
        de07e83837e1d8de6663cc0bec3c29836e46c28b03e8d45656d3967c8f9630f5
        hämtad:
        2026-10-25
        source_confidence:
        official
        bygge:
        legal-2026-10-25

        Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Hovrätten för Övre Norrland, Sveriges Domstolar.

        The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.