Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · EUDR

Article 34Review

CELEX 32023R1115 · Read on 2026-10-06

Share this page

Short answer

the need for and feasibility of additional trade facilitation tools – and in particular for LDCs highly impacted by this Regulation and countries or parts thereof classified as standard or high risk – to support the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation;

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/avskogningsforordningen-2023-1115/artikel-34 · Short answer as data · Official text

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

the need for and feasibility of additional trade facilitation tools – and in particular for LDCs highly impacted by this Regulation and countries or parts thereof classified as standard or high risk – to support the achievement of the objectives of this Regulation;

the impact of this Regulation on farmers, in particular smallholders, Indigenous Peoples and local communities and the possible need for additional support for the transition towards sustainable supply chains and for smallholders to meet the requirements of this Regulation;

the further extension of the definition of forest degradation, on the basis of an in-depth analysis, and taking into account progress made in international discussions on the matter;

the threshold for mandatory use of polygons as referred to in Article 2, point (28), taking into account its impact on tackling deforestation and forest degradation;

changes in the trade patterns of the relevant commodities and relevant products included in the scope of this Regulation when those changes could be an indication of a practice of circumvention;

an assessment of whether the checks carried out have been effective to ensure that relevant commodities and relevant products made available on the market or exported comply with Article 3;

the possible extension of the scope of this Regulation to include other wooded land and the cut-off date referred to in Article 2, point (13), with a view to minimising the Union’s contribution to natural ecosystems’ conversion and degradation;

the possible extension of the scope of this Regulation to other natural ecosystems, including other land with high carbon stocks and with a high biodiversity value such as grasslands, peatlands and wetlands;

the impact of the relevant commodities on deforestation and forest degradation, as indicated by scientific evidence, and taking into account changes in consumption, including the need and feasibility of extending the scope of this Regulation to further commodities, including maize, and of amending or extending the list of relevant products, including the potential inclusion of biofuels (HS code 382600) in Annex I;

the role of financial institutions in preventing financial flows that contribute directly or indirectly to deforestation and forest degradation and the need to provide for any specific obligations for financial institutions in Union legal acts;

the role of downstream operators and traders in ensuring that supply chains are deforestation-free and that this Regulation achieves its objectives;

the role of micro or small primary operators in ensuring that production is deforestation-free and this Regulation achieves its objectives, and the possible risk of circumvention.

1. The Commission may adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 35 to amend Annex I with regard to the relevant CN codes of relevant products that contain, have been fed or have been made using relevant commodities.

1a. By 30 April 2026, the Commission shall carry out a simplification review of this Regulation and on this basis present a report to the European Parliament and to the Council accompanied, where appropriate, by a legislative proposal.

The article continues in the official text.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit