Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C-474/24AR and Others v Österreichische Datenschutzbehörde and Others
- Decided
- 2026-07-14
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2026:579
- CELEX
- 62024CJ0474
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
Also searched as: Case C-474/24, C-474/24 2026, ECLI:EU:C:2026:579.
The court's own keywords
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data – Regulation (EU) 2016/679 – Article 2 – Material scope – Articles 5 and 6 – Principles relating to processing and the lawfulness of processing – Article 9 – Concept of ‘data concerning health’ – Article 10 – Concept of ‘personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences’ – Combating doping in sport – Online publication of the name of a person who has infringed anti-doping rules, the length of time for which that person is banned from participating in sporting events and the reasons for that ban – Balancing of interests – Proportionality – Article 77 – Right to lodge a complaint with a supervisory authority where such publication is imminent.
Interprets
Core objects in the machine route
Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed
This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.
- Finality status
- Precedent and holding
- Relations between precedents
- Agent object, risk graph and relation graph
- Change graph
- Provenance and verified text
Source: NovaCopilot
Node map: relations between precedents
How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.
Reading relations …
Source: NovaCopilot
Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works
Machine addresses
- id
- eu:c-474-24
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit