Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C-405/20EB and Others v Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau (BVAEB)
- Decided
- 2022-05-05
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2022:347
- CELEX
- 62020CJ0405
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
Also searched as: Case C-405/20, C-405/20 2022, ECLI:EU:C:2022:347.
The court's own keywords
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social policy – Article 157 TFEU – Protocol (No 33) – Equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation – Directive 2006/54/EC – Article 5(c) and Article 12 – Prohibition of indirect discrimination on grounds of sex – Occupational social security scheme applicable after the date referred to in those provisions – Retirement pensions of civil servants – National legislation providing for an annual adjustment of retirement pensions – Adjustment on a reducing scale depending on the amount of the retirement pension, with no adjustment at all above a certain amount – Justifications.
Interprets
Core objects in the machine route
Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed
This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.
- Finality status
- Precedent and holding
- Relations between precedents
- Agent object, risk graph and relation graph
- Change graph
- Provenance and verified text
Source: NovaCopilot
Node map: relations between precedents
How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.
Reading relations …
Source: NovaCopilot
Articles in the ruling
The provisions are named in the court own keyword line. Read the article text here, the ruling at the source.
Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works
Machine addresses
- id
- eu:c-405-20
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit