Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment

C-280/25Parchetul de pe lângă Curtea de Apel Oradea v M.G.D

Decided
2026-07-16
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2026:586
CELEX
62025CJ0280
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

Also searched as: Case C-280/25, C-280/25 2026, ECLI:EU:C:2026:586.

The court's own keywords

Reference for a preliminary ruling – Protection of the financial interests of the European Union – Article 325(1) TFEU – Convention drawn up on the basis of Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, on the protection of the European Communities’ financial interests – Article 2(1) – Obligation to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union by taking effective deterrent measures – Obligation to provide for criminal penalties – Serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the Union – Concept – Limitation period for criminal liability – National standard of protection relating to the principle of the retroactive application of the more lenient criminal law (lex mitior principle) – Obligation for the courts of a Member State to disapply case-law of the supreme court of that Member State which is not in line with EU law – Application of the judgment of 24 July 2023, Lin (C‑107/23 PPU, EU:C:2023:606) – Constitutional prohibition on applying lex tertia – Limitation period already expired – Foreseeability of the conditions laid down by that judgment – Compatibility of that judgment with Article 7 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, signed in Rome on 4 November 1950.

Interprets

    Core objects in the machine route

    Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed

    This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.

    Source: NovaCopilot

    Node map: relations between precedents

    How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.

    Reading relations …

    Source: NovaCopilot

    NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

    NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

    Common questions

    What compensation do I get for a delayed flight in the EU?How long can I return an online purchase in the EU?Can I ask a company to delete my personal data?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

    Source: NovaCopilot

    Get official document

    Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works

    EUR-LexThe Court

    Machine addresses

    id
    eu:c-280-25

    Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

    The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

    Verifiable trust signals

    • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
    • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
    • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
    • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
    • Model card, source status and audit

    Model cardAudit