Agent · eidas-910-2014-34
eIDAS 2.0 artikel 34: Qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures
What is an agent? Agents execute decisions.
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
Also searched as: eIDAS Regulation article 34 · electronic identification article 34 · Regulation (EU) 2014/910 article 34
CELEX 32014R0910 · 2026-08-26 · Weight 80 · minimal-risk
ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.
- What this page is
- Agent, eIDAS 2.0 artikel 34
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-26Expired
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does eIDAS 2.0 Article 34 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
According to NovaCopilot (object nc:en:agent:eidas-910-2014:artikel-34): eIDAS 2.0 Article 34 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 3 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-26 against CELEX 32014R0910. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
Source: NovaCopilot, nc:en:agent:eidas-910-2014:artikel-34
eIDAS 2.0 Article 34Not yet verifiedOfficial text
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. A qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures may only be provided by a qualified trust service provider that uses procedures and technologies capable of extending the trustworthiness of the qualified electronic signature beyond the technological validity period.
- Paragraph 2 applies. 1a. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall be presumed where the arrangements for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures complies with the standards, specifications and procedures referred to in paragraph 2.
- Paragraph 3 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses. 2. By 21 May 2025, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. A qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures may only be provided by a qualified trust service provider that uses procedures and technologies capable of extending the trustworthiness of the qualified electronic signature beyond the technological validity period.
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
1a. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall be presumed where the arrangements for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures complies with the standards, specifications and procedures referred to in paragraph 2.
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses
2. By 21 May 2025, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Paragraph 3
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. A qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures may only be provided by a qualified trust service provider that uses procedures and technologies capable of extending the trustworthiness of the qualified electronic signature beyond the technological validity period.
- 21a. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall be presumed where the arrangements for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures complies with the standards, specifications and procedures referred to in paragraph 2.
- 32. By 21 May 2025, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32014R0910 art. 34, Qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/eidas-910-2014/artikel-34 (hämtad 2026-08-26, bevis sha256:03723c8702274050, bygge legal-2026-10-27).