Agent · eidas-910-2014-34

eIDAS 2.0 artikel 34: Qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures

Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.

CELEX 32014R0910 · 2026-08-26 · Weight 80 · minimal-risk

ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.

What this page is: Agent, eIDAS 2.0 artikel 34
Checked against the official source: 2026-08-26Current
Responsible publisher: ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position

Short answer

What does eIDAS 2.0 Article 34 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?

eIDAS 2.0 Article 34 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 3 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-26 against CELEX 32014R0910. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.

eIDAS 2.0 Article 34Checked against the publisher 2026-08-26Official text

Paragraph 1 applies. 1. A qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures may only be provided by a qualified trust service provider that uses procedures and technologies capable of extending the trustworthiness of the qualified electronic signature beyond the technological validity period.
Paragraph 2 applies. 1a. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall be presumed where the arrangements for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures complies with the standards, specifications and procedures referred to in paragraph 2.
Paragraph 3 applies. 2. By 21 May 2025, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

A source reference, not legal advice.

Jurisdiction

The same agent, read through one country's lens.

Inputs

in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3)

Rule tree

If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. A qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures may only be provided by a qualified trust service provider that uses procedures and technologies capable of extending the trustworthiness of the qualified electronic signature beyond the technological validity period.
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
1a. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall be presumed where the arrangements for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures complies with the standards, specifications and procedures referred to in paragraph 2.
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
2. By 21 May 2025, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).
Paragraph 3

If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

The article text as read

11. A qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures may only be provided by a qualified trust service provider that uses procedures and technologies capable of extending the trustworthiness of the qualified electronic signature beyond the technological validity period.
21a. Compliance with the requirements laid down in paragraph 1 shall be presumed where the arrangements for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures complies with the standards, specifications and procedures referred to in paragraph 2.
32. By 21 May 2025, the Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 48(2).

Lineage

treatyTFEU art. 288 (förordning)

act32014R0910

chapter—

article34

paragraphs3

jurisdictionEuropean Union (EU)

supervisor—

national—

Interface

callhttps://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/agents/eidas-910-2014-34/run

methodGET

outputmatched, outcome, trace, missing, hash

Quota60 anrop per minut och adress, utan nyckel

stabilityRegelträdet versioneras. En ändring byter artefakthash, aldrig adress.

Hashes

textsha256:6ca1a6cabedae670ba9da27b170f8e5774cbe79b4220c21e1d808812935fe735

scriptsha256:3f5012d84f31166bbd9e4a1ca6caf7ca1703234982fca534ea1d4672d9f5295d

enginesha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0

agentsha256:f0af16b7abd55a8aaea36367765ed73a13b2f60ed74d288f162cfa553c913fed

versionagent-engine-1+legal-2026-08-25 / f0af16b7abd55a8a

Artefacts

No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Citation: 32014R0910 art. 34, Qualified preservation service for qualified electronic signatures. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/eidas-910-2014/artikel-34 (hämtad 2026-08-26, bevis sha256:92b583fa37d1eda8, bygge legal-2026-08-25).