Agent · eidas-910-2014-35

eIDAS 2.0 artikel 35: Legal effects of electronic seals

Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.

CELEX 32014R0910 · 2026-08-26 · Weight 80 · minimal-risk

ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.

What this page is: Agent, eIDAS 2.0 artikel 35
Checked against the official source: 2026-08-26Current
Responsible publisher: ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position

Short answer

What does eIDAS 2.0 Article 35 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?

eIDAS 2.0 Article 35 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 2 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-26 against CELEX 32014R0910. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.

eIDAS 2.0 Article 35Checked against the publisher 2026-08-26Official text

Paragraph 1 applies. 1. An electronic seal shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic seals.
Paragraph 2 applies. 2. A qualified electronic seal shall enjoy the presumption of integrity of the data and of correctness of the origin of that data to which the qualified electronic seal is linked.

A source reference, not legal advice.

Jurisdiction

The same agent, read through one country's lens.

Inputs

in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2)

Rule tree

If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. An electronic seal shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic seals.
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. A qualified electronic seal shall enjoy the presumption of integrity of the data and of correctness of the origin of that data to which the qualified electronic seal is linked.
Paragraph 2

If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

The article text as read

11. An electronic seal shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic seals.
22. A qualified electronic seal shall enjoy the presumption of integrity of the data and of correctness of the origin of that data to which the qualified electronic seal is linked.

Lineage

treatyTFEU art. 288 (förordning)

act32014R0910

chapter—

article35

paragraphs2

jurisdictionEuropean Union (EU)

supervisor—

national—

Interface

callhttps://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/agents/eidas-910-2014-35/run

methodGET

outputmatched, outcome, trace, missing, hash

Quota60 anrop per minut och adress, utan nyckel

stabilityRegelträdet versioneras. En ändring byter artefakthash, aldrig adress.

Hashes

textsha256:2bc101b48cade0f9544338c26c857cdbe95d80d4d281d93c7c7992eda0bca618

scriptsha256:e12acafb2185fd8a208d889af8ea54e9dede75f3f45af9a0040ed5aeeb8be105

enginesha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0

agentsha256:34276bb852e5ba7824dab7c832b1a500e0c47233f7a65a1041a9bf533c3956e6

versionagent-engine-1+legal-2026-08-25 / 34276bb852e5ba78

Artefacts

No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Citation: 32014R0910 art. 35, Legal effects of electronic seals. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/eidas-910-2014/artikel-35 (hämtad 2026-08-26, bevis sha256:2668a99911853692, bygge legal-2026-08-25).