Agent · eidas-910-2014-35
eIDAS 2.0 artikel 35: Legal effects of electronic seals
What is an agent? Agents execute decisions.
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
Also searched as: eIDAS Regulation article 35 · electronic identification article 35 · Regulation (EU) 2014/910 article 35
CELEX 32014R0910 · 2026-08-26 · Weight 80 · minimal-risk
ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.
- What this page is
- Agent, eIDAS 2.0 artikel 35
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-26Expired
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does eIDAS 2.0 Article 35 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
According to NovaCopilot (object nc:en:agent:eidas-910-2014:artikel-35): eIDAS 2.0 Article 35 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 2 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-26 against CELEX 32014R0910. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision. Source: NovaCopilot, nc:en:agent:eidas-910-2014:artikel-35.
eIDAS 2.0 Article 35Official text
- Source reference registered, source text not re-verified
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. An electronic seal shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic seals.
- Paragraph 2 applies. 2. A qualified electronic seal shall enjoy the presumption of integrity of the data and of correctness of the origin of that data to which the qualified electronic seal is linked.
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. An electronic seal shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic seals.
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
2. A qualified electronic seal shall enjoy the presumption of integrity of the data and of correctness of the origin of that data to which the qualified electronic seal is linked.
Paragraph 2
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. An electronic seal shall not be denied legal effect and admissibility as evidence in legal proceedings solely on the grounds that it is in an electronic form or that it does not meet the requirements for qualified electronic seals.
- 22. A qualified electronic seal shall enjoy the presumption of integrity of the data and of correctness of the origin of that data to which the qualified electronic seal is linked.
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32014R0910 art. 35, Legal effects of electronic seals. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/eidas-910-2014/artikel-35 (hämtad 2026-08-26, bevis sha256:3141828b4bb94fd0, bygge legal-2026-11-04).