Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

NovaCopilot's registers are reviewed daily against official sources

RH 2006:30

RH 2006:30, Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland (2005)

Judgment of Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, 2005. Statutes applied: Arbetsmiljölag. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Straffbestämmelsen i 8 kap. 2 § 4 arbetsmiljölagen för den som utan giltigt skäl tar bort en skyddsanordning eller sätter den ur bruk har ansetts inte kunna medföra ansvar för en verkställande direktör i ett verkstadsbolag i ett fall där enskilda arbetstagare vidtagit sådana åtgärder utan dennes kännedom.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What the court said

    Straffbestämmelsen i 8 kap. 2 § 4 arbetsmiljölagen för den som utan giltigt skäl tar bort en skyddsanordning eller sätter den ur bruk har ansetts inte kunna medföra ansvar för en verkställande direktör i ett verkstadsbolag i ett fall där enskilda arbetstagare vidtagit sådana åtgärder utan dennes kännedom.

  2. Why it matters

    Decision by Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, 2005. Applies AML.

Related questions

Risk profile of the decision

MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.

  • Applies one statute
  • 29 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about employment law, and 5 question pages in the register rest on the same statute.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

  • AMLSFS 1977:1160

Decisions (8)

Agent commands

  • runCaseSummary()

    The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

  • runLegalImpact()

    Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

  • runObligationCheck()

    Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

  • runProofVerify()

    Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2006-30/manifest.json

NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

Common questions

What compensation do I get for a delayed flight in the EU?How long can I return an online purchase in the EU?Can I ask a company to delete my personal data?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

Source: NovaCopilot

NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

Court
Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland
Decided
2005-12-12
Applies
1

Mål nr B 879-04

Also searched as: RH 2006 30, Rättsfall från hovrätterna 2006:30, Swedish judgment RH 2006:30, Case RH 2006:30, RH 2006:30 2005, B 879-04, Case B 879-04.

  • 8 kap. 2 § 4 arbetsmiljölagen (1977:1160)
Hämta hela domen

Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, Sveriges Domstolar

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

Verified, unchanged

Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20

See the open quality meter

Statutes

  • AML

    SFS 1977:1160 · Employment law

Case law

Case law read on 2026-09-05.

Change monitoring

The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

Change monitoring
FieldValue
RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
PublisherSveriges Domstolar
Last read2026-09-05
IntervalEvery 30 days
Next re-read2026-10-05
StatusRe-read scheduled
Open the register at the publisher

Row history

Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

Row history
DateEventSource
2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
2005-12-12Date of decision according to Hovrätten för Nedre NorrlandHovrätten för Nedre Norrland
1978-07-01Applied statute in force: SFS 1977:1160Sveriges riksdag

Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

What changed this week, every Monday

A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

Topics

Cite this row

The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

RH 2006:30, Straffbestämmelsen i 8 kap. 2 § 4 arbetsmiljölagen för den som utan giltigt skäl tar bort en skyddsanordning eller sätter den ur bruk har ansetts inte kunna medföra ansvar för en verkställande direktör i ett verkstadsbolag i ett fall där enskilda arbetstagare vidtagit sådana åtgärder utan dennes kännedom.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2006-30 (hämtad 2026-10-14, bevis sha256:450bef0936257e5d, bygge legal-2026-10-14).

Machine addressHow to cite the platform
sha256:
450bef0936257e5d153b3f0a348f2b6b4ed0b499b69d57a5375c6817ccfa7012
hämtad:
2026-10-14
source_confidence:
official
bygge:
legal-2026-10-14
officiell källa:
https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/08c9f040-c27f-4ca2-b2e1-bd78c1f2b32f

Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, Sveriges Domstolar.

The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.