Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

NovaCopilot's registers are reviewed daily against official sources

RH 1995:177

RH 1995:177, Svea hovrätt (1995)

Judgment of Svea hovrätt, 1995. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Brottsrubricering, straffmätning och påföljd i mål om rattfylleri. - Referat nr 23 av totalt 74 hovrättsdomar som meddelats under år 1995 (referat RH 1995:155-228). Domarna har antingen vunnit laga kraft eller också har prövningstillstånd inte meddelats. I referaten har angivits den gärning som funnits styrkt, hovrättens rubricering och den av den av hovrätten bestämda påföljden samt de skäl som anförts. Skiljaktiga meningar har inte redovisats.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Brottsrubricering, straffmätning och påföljd i mål om rattfylleri. - Referat nr 23 av totalt 74 hovrättsdomar som meddelats under år 1995 (referat RH 1995:155-228).

  2. What the court said

    I referaten har angivits den gärning som funnits styrkt, hovrättens rubricering och den av den av hovrätten bestämda påföljden samt de skäl som anförts.

  3. Why it matters

    Decision by Svea hovrätt, 1995.

Risk profile of the decision

LowThe decision carries little weight when relied upon alone. Read it together with the statute and later decisions.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (0)

    Questions (0)

      Agent commands

      • runCaseSummary()

        The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

      • runLegalImpact()

        Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

      • runObligationCheck()

        Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

      • runProofVerify()

        Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

      https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-1995-177/manifest.json

      NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free, 15 with a free account.

      NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

      Common questions

      Source: NovaCopilot · Create free account

      NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

      The full basis, ready-made

      EU judgment pack (C cases), total 48.75 € (about 53 USD)

      Evidence chain and hash per row included. One-time purchase, delivered instantly.

      Open the pack
      Court
      Svea hovrätt
      Decided
      1995-09-28
      Applies
      0

      Mål nr B 848-95

      Also searched as: RH 1995 177, Rättsfall från hovrätterna 1995:177, Swedish judgment RH 1995:177, Case RH 1995:177, RH 1995:177 1995, B 848-95, Case B 848-95.

      Hämta hela domen

      Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

      Svea hovrätt, Sveriges Domstolar

      Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

      Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20

      Next check 2026-10-20 · Fresh

      See the open quality meter

      Statutes

        Case law read on 2026-09-05.

        Change monitoring

        The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

        Change monitoring
        FieldValue
        RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        PublisherSveriges Domstolar
        Last read2026-09-05
        IntervalEvery 30 days
        Next re-read2026-10-05
        StatusChecked against the publisher
        Open the register at the publisher

        Row history

        Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

        Row history
        DateEventSource
        2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        1995-09-28Date of decision according to Svea hovrättSvea hovrätt

        Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

        What changed this week, every Monday

        A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

        Topics

        Cite this row

        The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

        RH 1995:177, Brottsrubricering, straffmätning och påföljd i mål om rattfylleri. - Referat nr 23 av totalt 74 hovrättsdomar som meddelats under år 1995 (referat RH 1995:155-228). Domarna har antingen vunnit laga kraft eller också har prövningstillstånd inte meddelats. I referaten har angivits den gärning som funnits styrkt, hovrättens rubricering och den av den av hovrätten bestämda påföljden samt de skäl som anförts. Skiljaktiga meningar har inte redovisats.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-1995-177 (hämtad 2026-10-02, bevis sha256:ca6b4f0c4c04dc08, bygge legal-2026-10-02).

        Machine addressHow to cite the platform
        sha256:
        ca6b4f0c4c04dc08fa4dbed894b48469be28b38026f6592fb54d3d020ce22e00
        hämtad:
        2026-10-02
        source_confidence:
        official
        bygge:
        legal-2026-10-02
        officiell källa:
        https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/2fdad782-e19f-4130-93a1-221e7048dd36

        Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Svea hovrätt, Sveriges Domstolar.

        The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.