Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

RÅ 2010 ref. 66

RÅ 2010 ref. 66, Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011 (2010)

Judgment of Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011, 2010. Statutes applied: Kreditupplysningslag. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Datainspektionen har inte ansetts ha haft tillräckliga skäl för att meddela ett principiellt förbud mot att använda uppgifter om obetalda fakturor i kreditupplysningsverksamhet.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What the court said

    Datainspektionen har inte ansetts ha haft tillräckliga skäl för att meddela ett principiellt förbud mot att använda uppgifter om obetalda fakturor i kreditupplysningsverksamhet.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011, 2010. Applies Kreditupplysningslagen.

Risk profile of the decision

MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011
  • Applies one statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about data protection.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (4)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2010-66/manifest.json

    NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

    NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

    Common questions

    What compensation do I get for a delayed flight in the EU?How long can I return an online purchase in the EU?Can I ask a company to delete my personal data?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

    Source: NovaCopilot

    NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

    Court
    Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011
    Decided
    2010-06-24
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr 7338-07

    Also searched as: RÅ 2010 ref 66, RÅ 2010:66, RÅ 2010 66, Regeringsrättens årsbok 2010 ref 66, Swedish judgment RÅ 2010 ref 66, Case RÅ 2010 ref. 66, RÅ 2010 ref. 66 2010, 7338-07.

    • 4 § andra stycket och 5 § första stycket kreditupplysningslagen (1973:1173)
    Hämta hela domen

    Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

    Regeringsrätten, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Re-read scheduled

    Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20

    See the open quality meter

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-09-05.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-09-05
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-10-05
    StatusRe-read scheduled
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2010-06-24Date of decision according to RegeringsrättenRegeringsrätten
    1974-07-01Applied statute in force: SFS 1973:1173Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    What changed this week, every Monday

    A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

    Topics

    Cite this row

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    RÅ 2010 ref. 66, Datainspektionen har inte ansetts ha haft tillräckliga skäl för att meddela ett principiellt förbud mot att använda uppgifter om obetalda fakturor i kreditupplysningsverksamhet.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2010-66 (hämtad 2026-10-26, bevis sha256:153ecdaf42e61bbb, bygge legal-2026-10-26).

    Machine addressHow to cite the platform
    sha256:
    153ecdaf42e61bbb452050b09f96944e992e0892f1edc1026654ddde811edb8d
    hämtad:
    2026-10-26
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-10-26
    officiell källa:
    https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/a02e99d9-2cb7-4755-b27c-305938f1b4bd

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Regeringsrätten, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.