Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

NovaCopilot's registers are reviewed daily against official sources

RÅ 2007 ref. 82

RÅ 2007 ref. 82, Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011 (2008)

Judgment of Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011, 2008. Statutes applied: Kreditupplysningslag, Föräldrabalk. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Bestämmelsen i 9 kap. 14 § sekretesslagen om sekretess hos överförmyndare eller överförmyndarnämnd har inte ansetts hindra att uppgifter om vilka personer som har förvaltare enligt föräldrabalken lämnas till ett kreditupplysningsföretag.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What the court said

    Bestämmelsen i 9 kap. 14 § sekretesslagen om sekretess hos överförmyndare eller överförmyndarnämnd har inte ansetts hindra att uppgifter om vilka personer som har förvaltare enligt föräldrabalken lämnas till ett kreditupplysningsföretag.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011, 2008. Applies Kreditupplysningslagen, Föräldrabalken.

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011
  • Applies 2 statutes
  • 303 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about data protection, family and migration.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (2)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2007-82/manifest.json

    NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

    NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

    Common questions

    What compensation do I get for a delayed flight in the EU?How long can I return an online purchase in the EU?Can I ask a company to delete my personal data?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

    Source: NovaCopilot

    NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

    Court
    Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011
    Decided
    2008-01-07
    Applies
    2

    Mål nr 1355-07

    Also searched as: RÅ 2007 ref 82, RÅ 2007:82, RÅ 2007 82, Regeringsrättens årsbok 2007 ref 82, Swedish judgment RÅ 2007 ref 82, Case RÅ 2007 ref. 82, RÅ 2007 ref. 82 2008, 1355-07.

    • 3 §, 4 §, 6 §, 15 § och 17 § kreditupplysningslagen (1973:1173)
    • 11 kap. 27 § föräldrabalken (1949:381)
    Hämta hela domen

    Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

    Regeringsrätten, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Verified, unchanged

    Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20

    See the open quality meter

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-09-05.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-09-05
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-10-05
    StatusRe-read scheduled
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2008-01-07Date of decision according to RegeringsrättenRegeringsrätten
    1974-07-01Applied statute in force: SFS 1973:1173Sveriges riksdag
    1950-01-01Applied statute in force: SFS 1949:381Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    What changed this week, every Monday

    A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

    Topics

    Cite this row

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    RÅ 2007 ref. 82, Bestämmelsen i 9 kap. 14 § sekretesslagen om sekretess hos överförmyndare eller överförmyndarnämnd har inte ansetts hindra att uppgifter om vilka personer som har förvaltare enligt föräldrabalken lämnas till ett kreditupplysningsföretag.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2007-82 (hämtad 2026-10-18, bevis sha256:cafcd78cb530565a, bygge legal-2026-10-18).

    Machine addressHow to cite the platform
    sha256:
    cafcd78cb530565ae54571a24dc2294084c408c7fb76dfe18955d1f21490f060
    hämtad:
    2026-10-18
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-10-18
    officiell källa:
    https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/e6094f7b-ff56-4b96-935d-148f9f7dbc1e

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Regeringsrätten, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.