RÅ 2005 ref. 22
Socialstyrelsen har i ett tillsynsbeslut kritiserat en läkare för dennes ordination och intygsgivning
Socialstyrelsen har i ett tillsynsbeslut kritiserat en läkare för dennes ordination och intygsgivning. Beslutet har ansetts inte kunna bli föremål för rättsprövning.
The decision in three points
What happened
Socialstyrelsen har i ett tillsynsbeslut kritiserat en läkare för dennes ordination och intygsgivning.
What the court said
Beslutet har ansetts inte kunna bli föremål för rättsprövning.
Why it matters
Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011, 2005.
Risk profile of the decision
MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.
- Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011
Relations of the decision in the graph
Statutes (0)
Questions (0)
Decisions (4)
- RÅ 2010 ref. 122REGR
- RÅ 2010 ref. 123REGR
- RÅ 2010 ref. 116REGR
- RÅ 2010 ref. 113REGR
Agent commands
- runCaseSummary()
The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.
- runLegalImpact()
Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.
- runObligationCheck()
Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.
- runProofVerify()
Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.
https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ra-2005-22/manifest.json
- Court
- Supreme Administrative Court, before 2011
- Decided
- 2005-03-17
- Applies
- 0
Mål nr 3429-01
- 1 § lagen (1988:205) om rättsprövning av vissa förvaltningsbeslut
- 6 kap. 1 § och 8 kap. 16 § lagen (1998:531) om yrkesverksamhet på hälso- och sjukvårdens område
Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.
Statutes
Case law read on 2026-08-29.
Change monitoring
The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| Publisher | Sveriges Domstolar |
| Last read | 2026-08-29 |
| Interval | Every 30 days |
| Next re-read | 2026-09-28 |
| Status | Checked against the publisher |
Row history
Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-29 | Row read against the courts' own register | Sök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar |
| 2005-03-17 | Date of decision according to Regeringsrätten | Regeringsrätten |
Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.
Cite this row
The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.
RÅ 2005 ref. 22, Socialstyrelsen har i ett tillsynsbeslut kritiserat en läkare för dennes ordination och intygsgivning. Beslutet har ansetts inte kunna bli föremål för rättsprövning.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ra-2005-22 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:95f075352313c8ab, bygge legal-2026-08-25).
- sha256:
- 95f075352313c8abfc7f7ec93370b07cf500f3950e37cc11678a2149ab704fb5
- hämtad:
- 2026-08-25
- source_confidence:
- official
- bygge:
- legal-2026-08-25
Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Regeringsrätten, Sveriges Domstolar.
The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.