Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

NJA 2019 s. 23

NJA 2019 s. 23, Supreme Court of Sweden (2019)

Judgment of Supreme Court of Sweden, 2019. Statutes applied: Sambolag. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Can you recover money paid for your partner's property after a break up?

Not according to NJA 2019 s. 23, unless you can prove it was a loan. A cohabitant had paid bills for the other partner's property, used jointly but not joint cohabitant property. The paying partner had the burden of proving a loan and failed. The Swedish Supreme Court also held that he had no claim based on unjust enrichment.

Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar · Source: NovaCopilot

Original headnote (Swedish)

En sambo har betalat fakturor som avsett den andra sambons egendom som inte var samboegendom men som användes av samborna gemensamt. Den betalande sambon har ansetts ha bevisbördan för sitt påstående att betalningen utgjort ett penninglån. När han inte bevisat sitt påstående uppkommer frågan om han har rätt till ersättning på den grunden att den andra sambon, sedan samboförhållandet upphört, har gjort en obehörig vinst. Frågan har besvarats nekande.

Share this page

Core question

Frågan har besvarats nekande

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    En sambo har betalat fakturor som avsett den andra sambons egendom som inte var samboegendom men som användes av samborna gemensamt.

  2. What the court said

    Den betalande sambon har ansetts ha bevisbördan för sitt påstående att betalningen utgjort ett penninglån.

  3. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden, 2019. Applies Sambolagen.

Risk profile of the decision

HighThe decision carries substantial weight when relied upon. The reasons below show what the level rests on.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Supreme Court of Sweden
  • Applies one statute
  • 22 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about family and migration.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/nja-2019-s-23/manifest.json

    NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

    NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

    Common questions

    What compensation do I get for a delayed flight in the EU?How long can I return an online purchase in the EU?Can I ask a company to delete my personal data?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

    Source: NovaCopilot

    NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

    Court
    Supreme Court of Sweden
    Decided
    2019-02-06
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr T 1634-18

    Also searched as: NJA 2019 s 23, NJA 2019:23, NJA 2019 23, Nytt juridiskt arkiv 2019 s 23, Swedish judgment NJA 2019 s 23, Case NJA 2019 s. 23, NJA 2019 s. 23 2019, T 1634-18.

    • 1 §, 2 §, 3 §, 8 § sambolagen (2003:376)
    Hämta hela domen

    Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

    Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Re-read scheduled

    Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20

    See the open quality meter

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-09-05.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-09-05
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-10-05
    StatusRe-read scheduled
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2019-02-06Date of decision according to Högsta domstolenHögsta domstolen
    2003-07-01Applied statute in force: SFS 2003:376Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    What changed this week, every Monday

    A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

    Topics

    Cite this row

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    NJA 2019 s. 23, En sambo har betalat fakturor som avsett den andra sambons egendom som inte var samboegendom men som användes av samborna gemensamt. Den betalande sambon har ansetts ha bevisbördan för sitt påstående att betalningen utgjort ett penninglån. När han inte bevisat sitt påstående uppkommer frågan om han har rätt till ersättning på den grunden att den andra sambon, sedan samboförhållandet upphört, har gjort en obehörig vinst. Frågan har besvarats nekande.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/nja-2019-s-23 (hämtad 2026-10-25, bevis sha256:7253a6a7bd00daa1, bygge legal-2026-10-25).

    Machine addressHow to cite the platform
    sha256:
    7253a6a7bd00daa101acb3acdd8f302f73678cbb11bba61ee90d5a5f92143679
    hämtad:
    2026-10-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-10-25
    officiell källa:
    https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/ddd441a0-1676-45ef-af29-e823aefbd347

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Högsta domstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.