Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

SMLM Previewerrors, bugs and incomplete coverage may occurThe model is production-ready during Q4-26

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

NovaCopilot's registers are reviewed daily against official sources

AD 2017 nr 3

AD 2017 nr 3, Swedish Labour Court (2017)

Judgment of Swedish Labour Court, 2017. The headnote below is reproduced verbatim in Swedish, as published by the court.

Original headnote (Swedish)

Huvudsakligen fråga om arbetsgivaren haft saklig grund att säga upp en distansarbetande säljare. Enligt arbetsgivaren har arbetstagaren inte följt arbetsgivarens policy om sjukanmälan, brustit i sin rapporteringsskyldighet, brustit i sina arbetsprestationer och arbetsvägrat. Vidare fråga om rätt till lön enligt 34 § anställningsskyddslagen och om ett på visst sätt formulerat yrkande om ogiltigförklaring av uppsägningen varit en tillåten talan, om det funnits något fastställelseintresse.

Share this page

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Huvudsakligen fråga om arbetsgivaren haft saklig grund att säga upp en distansarbetande säljare.

  2. Why it matters

    Published as a guiding decision by Swedish Labour Court, 2017.

Risk profile of the decision

MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.

  • Published as a guiding decision by Swedish Labour Court

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (0)

    Questions (0)

      Agent commands

      • runCaseSummary()

        The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

      • runLegalImpact()

        Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

      • runObligationCheck()

        Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

      • runProofVerify()

        Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

      https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/ad-2017-3/manifest.json

      NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

      NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

      Common questions

      What compensation do I get for a delayed flight in the EU?How long can I return an online purchase in the EU?Can I ask a company to delete my personal data?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

      Source: NovaCopilot

      NovaCopilot, start page with all registers: case law, legislation, compliance and health.

      Court
      Swedish Labour Court
      Decided
      2017-01-18
      Applies
      0

      Mål nr B 57-16

      Also searched as: AD 2017:3, AD 2017 3, Arbetsdomstolens domar 2017 nr 3, Swedish judgment AD 2017 nr 3, Case AD 2017 nr 3, AD 2017 nr 3 2017, B 57-16, Case B 57-16.

      • 7 §, 8 §, 10 § och 34 § lagen (1982:80) om anställningsskydd
      • 13 kap. 2 § rättegångsbalken (1942:740)
      Hämta hela domen

      Hämtas direkt från Sveriges Domstolar när du klickar. Vi lagrar inte domen.

      Arbetsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar

      Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

      Verified, unchanged

      Checked against the publisher 2026-09-20 · Next check 2026-10-20

      See the open quality meter

      Statutes

        Case law read on 2026-09-05.

        Change monitoring

        The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

        Change monitoring
        FieldValue
        RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        PublisherSveriges Domstolar
        Last read2026-09-05
        IntervalEvery 30 days
        Next re-read2026-10-05
        StatusRe-read scheduled
        Open the register at the publisher

        Row history

        Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

        Row history
        DateEventSource
        2026-09-05Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
        2017-01-18Date of decision according to ArbetsdomstolenArbetsdomstolen

        Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

        What changed this week, every Monday

        A short letter with new judgments and rule changes in your areas, each with source and checksum. Free, unsubscribe any time.

        Topics

        Cite this row

        The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

        AD 2017 nr 3, Huvudsakligen fråga om arbetsgivaren haft saklig grund att säga upp en distansarbetande säljare. Enligt arbetsgivaren har arbetstagaren inte följt arbetsgivarens policy om sjukanmälan, brustit i sin rapporteringsskyldighet, brustit i sina arbetsprestationer och arbetsvägrat. Vidare fråga om rätt till lön enligt 34 § anställningsskyddslagen och om ett på visst sätt formulerat yrkande om ogiltigförklaring av uppsägningen varit en tillåten talan, om det funnits något fastställelseintresse.. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/ad-2017-3 (hämtad 2026-10-18, bevis sha256:f0d366b6d0414e9d, bygge legal-2026-10-18).

        Machine addressHow to cite the platform
        sha256:
        f0d366b6d0414e9d8b164b0eb2b7247c3f985c01ab3726d58846bf2621e06966
        hämtad:
        2026-10-18
        source_confidence:
        official
        bygge:
        legal-2026-10-18
        officiell källa:
        https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/12598aca-b9ed-4be8-8c07-ebb4ef1393c8

        Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Arbetsdomstolen, Sveriges Domstolar.

        The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.