AI Act — 6: Classification rules for high-risk AI systems
AI Act — 6: Classification rules for high-risk AI systems seen through the recitals: the source row from the register, the obligations it carries, the roles it reaches and the steps it belongs to. The legal text stays with the source — here you get the link, the address and the reading date.
Share this page
Source row from the register
- The high-risk classification: product safety legislation and Annex III as the two tracks.
Recitals interpreting the article
- 27: The high-risk classification: product safety legislation and Annex III as the two tracks.
What forces a redo
- The node hash changes — the text behind the row is no longer the same.
- The reading date moves forward — the row has been re-read against the source.
- A timeline passes — the requirement starts to apply or tightens.
As data
- The same node as data: add ?format=json to the address, or ?format=agent for receipt and dependencies.
Workflows
Relations
Metadata
- Acts
- AI Act
- Articles
- 1
- Reading date
- 2026-08-31
- Freshness
- 74/100
- Hash
- dfbe296234e74aa4
- Corpus version
- legal-2026-08-25
- Next check
- —
- CELEX
- 32024R1689
Next step
Three ways to put the register to work in your own practice.
Start with your task
Litigation
Find support in a judgment
Search guiding decisions, see what became final and follow changes in the law.
In-house, deals
Map the rules in a transaction
Move from theme to act and on to the article that carries the duty.
Compliance
Assess the risk in a process
Risk scoring per legal area, with the sources behind every score.