Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · MiCA

Article 119Colleges for issuers of significant asset-referenced tokens and significant e-money tokens

CELEX 32023R1114 · Read on 2026-08-18

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. Within 30 calendar days of a decision to classify an asset-referenced token or e-money token as significant pursuant to Article 43, 44, 56 or 57, as applicable, EBA shall establish, manage and chair a consultative supervisory college for each issuer of a significant asset-referenced token or of a significant e-money token, to facilitate the exercise of supervisory tasks and act as a vehicle for the coordination of supervisory activities under this Regulation.

2. A college referred to in paragraph 1 shall consist of:

(a)

EBA;

(b)

ESMA;

(c)

the competent authorities of the home Member State where the issuer of the significant asset-referenced token or of the significant e-money token is established;

(d)

the competent authorities of the most relevant crypto-asset service providers, credit institutions or investment firms ensuring the custody of the reserve assets in accordance with Article 37 or of the funds received in exchange of the significant e-money tokens;

(e)

where applicable, the competent authorities of the most relevant trading platforms for crypto-assets where the significant asset-referenced tokens or the significant e-money tokens are admitted to trading;

(f)

the competent authorities of the most relevant payment service providers providing payment services in relation to the significant e-money tokens;

The article continues in the official text.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Six fixed blocks, one source per line
  • No sentence written by a language model
  • Engine version and read date on every answer
  • No customer data, no documents, no advice
  • Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act

Model cardAudit