EU regulatory register · MiCA
Article 120Non-binding opinions of the colleges for issuers of significant asset-referenced tokens and significant e-money tokens
CELEX 32023R1114 · Read on 2026-08-18
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. A college referred to in Article 119(1) may issue a non-binding opinion on the following:
(a)
the supervisory reassessment as referred to in Article 117(3);
(b)
any decision to require an issuer of a significant asset-referenced token or a significant e-money token to hold a higher amount of own funds in accordance with Article 35(2), (3) and (5), Article 45(5) and Article 58(1), as applicable;
(c)
any update of the recovery plan or redemption plan of an issuer of a significant asset-referenced token or an issuer of a significant e-money token pursuant to Articles 46, 47 and 55, as applicable;
(d)
any change of the business model of an issuer of a significant asset-referenced token pursuant to Article 25(1);
(e)
a draft modified crypto-asset white paper drawn up in accordance with Article 25(2);
(f)
any envisaged appropriate corrective measures pursuant to Article 25(4);
(g)
The article continues in the official text.
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Six fixed blocks, one source per line
- No sentence written by a language model
- Engine version and read date on every answer
- No customer data, no documents, no advice
- Model card and audit published under the EU AI Act