EU regulatory register · EHDS
Article 102Evaluation, review and progress report
CELEX 32025R0327 · Read on 2026-08-31
Short answer
1. By 26 March 2033, the Commission shall carry out a targeted evaluation of this Regulation, and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, accompanied, where appropriate, by a proposal for its amendment.
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/helsodata-2025-327/artikel-102 · Short answer as data · Official text
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. By 26 March 2033, the Commission shall carry out a targeted evaluation of this Regulation, and submit a report on its main findings to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, accompanied, where appropriate, by a proposal for its amendment. That evaluation shall cover the following:
(a)
the possibilities of further extending interoperability between EHR systems and electronic health data access services other than those established by the Member States;
(b)
the need to update the data categories referred to in Article 51 and the purposes listed in Article 53(1);
(c)
the implementation and use by natural persons of the mechanisms to opt out from secondary use referred to in Article 71, in particular on the impact of those mechanisms on public health, scientific research and fundamental rights;
(d)
the use and implementation of any stricter measures introduced pursuant to Article 51(4);
(e)
the exercise and implementation of the right referred to in Article 8;
(f)
an assessment of the certification framework for EHR systems established in Chapter III and the need to introduce further tools regarding conformity assessment;
(g)
The article continues in the official text.
Follow-up questions
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit