Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the act

EU regulatory register · AI Act

Article 90Alerts of systemic risks by the scientific panel

CELEX 32024R1689 · Read on 2026-08-18 · Chapter IX

Share this page

Short answer

1. The scientific panel may provide a qualified alert to the AI Office where it has reason to suspect that:

Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/ai-act-2024-1689/artikel-90 · Short answer as data · Official text

AI Act in short

Some AI uses are banned, high-risk AI requires risk management and human oversight, and deployers must ensure AI literacy.

Source: NovaCopilot

Official text

Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.

1. The scientific panel may provide a qualified alert to the AI Office where it has reason to suspect that:

(a)

a general-purpose AI model poses concrete identifiable risk at Union level; or

(b)

a general-purpose AI model meets the conditions referred to in Article 51.

2. Upon such qualified alert, the Commission, through the AI Office and after having informed the Board, may exercise the powers laid down in this Section for the purpose of assessing the matter. The AI Office shall inform the Board of any measure according to Articles 91 to 94.

3. A qualified alert shall be duly reasoned and indicate at least:

(a)

the point of contact of the provider of the general-purpose AI model with systemic risk concerned;

(b)

a description of the relevant facts and the reasons for the alert by the scientific panel;

(c)

any other information that the scientific panel considers to be relevant, including, where appropriate, information gathered on its own initiative.

Open the article on EUR-Lex

Follow-up questions

Other articles in this chapter

The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.

Verifiable trust signals

  • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
  • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
  • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
  • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
  • Model card, source status and audit

Model cardAudit