EU regulatory register · AI Act
Article 83Formal non-compliance
CELEX 32024R1689 · Read on 2026-08-18 · Chapter IX
Short answer
1. Where the market surveillance authority of a Member State makes one of the following findings, it shall require the relevant provider to put an end to the non-compliance concerned, within a period it may prescribe:
Verbatim from the article. Source: NovaCopilot · https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/rattsakter/ai-act-2024-1689/artikel-83 · Short answer as data · Official text
AI Act in short
Some AI uses are banned, high-risk AI requires risk management and human oversight, and deployers must ensure AI literacy.
Source: NovaCopilot
Official text
Read from the EU Publications Office for this CELEX number. The wording stands as published; nothing here is rewritten or summarised.
1. Where the market surveillance authority of a Member State makes one of the following findings, it shall require the relevant provider to put an end to the non-compliance concerned, within a period it may prescribe:
(a)
the CE marking has been affixed in violation of Article 48;
(b)
the CE marking has not been affixed;
(c)
the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47 has not been drawn up;
(d)
the EU declaration of conformity referred to in Article 47 has not been drawn up correctly;
(e)
the registration in the EU database referred to in Article 71 has not been carried out;
(f)
where applicable, no authorised representative has been appointed;
(g)
The article continues in the official text.
Follow-up questions
Other articles in this chapter
The text is quoted from the official source and is not legal advice. A national court reads the language version that binds in its jurisdiction.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit