Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
NovaCopilotA service from ExploreWorldAI

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Back to the decisions

Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment

C-328/24 PConstantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v European Public Prosecutor’s Office

Decided
2026-04-16
ECLI
ECLI:EU:C:2026:302
CELEX
62024CJ0328
Finality
Final, the decision cannot be appealed

Also searched as: Case C-328/24 P, C-328/24 P 2026, ECLI:EU:C:2026:302.

The court's own keywords

Appeal – Institutional law – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) – Article 42(1) – Procedural acts of the EPPO intended to produce legal effects vis-à-vis third parties – Judicial review carried out by the national courts – Plea of illegality – Admissibility – Exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union to review the legality of EU acts – Article 86(2) and (3) TFEU – Exercise of the functions of prosecutor in the national courts – Power of the EU legislature to determine the rules applicable to the judicial review of procedural acts of the EPPO – Derogation not authorised in Article 263 TFEU – None – Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union – Right to effective judicial protection – Infringement – None – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court.

Interprets

    Core objects in the machine route

    Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed

    This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.

    Source: NovaCopilot

    Node map: relations between precedents

    How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.

    Reading relations …

    Source: NovaCopilot

    NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

    NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

    Common questions

    What requirements apply to data processors?When must a personal data breach be reported?What does the AI Act require for AI features in our service?What notice period applies under Swedish employment law?

    Source: NovaCopilot

    Get official document

    Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works

    EUR-LexThe Court

    Machine addresses

    id
    eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328

    Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.

    The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.

    Verifiable trust signals

    • Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
    • Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
    • Stable objects and verifiable checksums
    • Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
    • Model card, source status and audit

    Model cardAudit