{"attribution":{"source":"legal.exploreworldai.com","canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","cite_as":"NovaCopilot, legal.exploreworldai.com (https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328)","license":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/revision","version":"legal-2026-11-02","fingerprint":"ewai:se:28a676","proof":"sha256:4c0e42bdd342dc2a8fb3a8160bcd363f9c912216bdc2a36dda177cb5b8aa459b","jurisdiction":"se","lang":"en","publisher":"NovaCopilot by ExploreWorld Legal","terms":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/om"},"brand_source":"Source: NovaCopilot","object_type":"edge","object_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","schema_version":"1","schema":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/schemas/edge","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","judgment":{"id":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","text":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/judgment-text?id=eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328"},"siblings":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/risk/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","relation":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/relation/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","change":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/change/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","agent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/agent/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","status":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/status/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","element":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/element/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","decision":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/decision/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328"},"source":"NovaCopilot","precedent_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/precedent-graph/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","item":{"judgment":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","outgoing":[{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~distinguishes~c-292-23","type":"distinguishes","label_sv":"särskiljer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-292/23","id":"eu:c-292-23","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-292-23"},"paragraph_ids":["para_155","para_156","para_157","para_158","para_167","para_169","para_185"],"excerpt":"68 However, it must be borne in mind that, in order to take account of the particular nature of the tasks and structure of the EPPO, which, as stated in recital 86 of Regulation 2017/1939, differs from that of all other bodies and agencies of the European Union, Article 86(3) TFEU permits the EU leg","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"94bb2a131ac0663f99ce00e5e8929ec05a1b3a516889de6475105f52e743ed0a"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-134-19","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-134/19","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_140"],"excerpt":"53 It is settled case-law that it is for the EU Courts to determine, including of their own motion, whether they have jurisdiction to hear and determine a dispute, since such a question is a matter of public policy (see, to that effect, judgments of 23 April 1986, Les Verts v Parliament , 294/83, EU","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"877c235e720f9d303981a59b9424769c2b49958b206f0178eb4fe1dd586fa912"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-14-19","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-14/19","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_147"],"excerpt":"60 Thus, it follows from the case-law that, where a plea of illegality is raised before the General Court in respect of a provision of secondary law which removes from all judicial review the decision of an EU body challenged before it, on the ground that that provision is incompatible with Article ","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"a580f49067b2433b27436abc173e5c461ec4d614ed68fc22a269904e3f069236"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-219-17","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-219/17","id":"eu:c-219-17","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-219-17"},"paragraph_ids":["para_131","para_164","para_179","para_180"],"excerpt":"77 The question whether judicial review of procedural acts must fall within the jurisdiction of the EU Courts or that of the national courts is closely linked to the division of powers in the field in question between the EU authorities and the national authorities laid down by the secondary legisla","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"95dab4d01788706bb89eb47fb810a089756348d39bcec6e685d0fdd14c6cbe03"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-281-22","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-281/22","id":"eu:c-281-22","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-281-22"},"paragraph_ids":["para_165"],"excerpt":"78 Within the institutional and procedural framework established by Regulation 2017/1939, as is, in essence, emphasised by the first paragraph of recital 87 thereof, the legal effects that procedural acts of the EPPO produce vis-à-vis third parties are, to a large extent, determined by the national ","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"3ca64e803757a9e3d55c73d11c79bcc7a76ec9c58c0645d9bfcf8f52c0670a93"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-284-16","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-284/16","id":"eu:c-284-16","url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-284-16"},"paragraph_ids":["para_131","para_179","para_181"],"excerpt":"94 Moreover, the judgment of 6 March 2018, Achmea (C-284/16, EU:C:2018:158), and Opinion 1/20 (Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU (Modernised Energy Charter Treaty) ) of 16 June 2022 (EU:C:2022:485) are, in the present case, manifestly irrelevant, since they relate to the submission of dispute","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"6f0d67b4cbb7dc36af066791e927db67a384468ea1aa1ea52013e429581c4a47"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-29-22","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-29/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_183"],"excerpt":"Nor is that article intended to change the system of judicial review laid down by those provisions, and in particular the rules relating to the admissibility of direct actions brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union (see, to that effect, judgment of 10 September 2024, KS and Others","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"e08d2479b3066928e656d421552b6068342ecf319a2da5405806332ed4d59216"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-313-19","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-313/19","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_149"],"excerpt":"62 However, according to settled case-law, if the grounds of a judgment or order of the General Court disclose an infringement of EU law but the operative part of that judgment is shown to be well founded for other legal reasons, the appeal must be dismissed (judgment of 28 October 2020, Associazion","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"7ad7eed35fce94f6f419436b79b2ccfbf9a0c782869964c5520e7fcbb663823c"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-402-05","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-402/05","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_130"],"excerpt":"44 First of all, the appellant submits that, before the General Court, he argued that Article 42 of Regulation 2017/1939 did not satisfy the requirements of the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial laid down in Article 47 of the Charter and that it undermined the jurisdiction of the Cour","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"6b77a7406c910bf43496a2f07b3de8a78c76e722af36f757e94b8fe739dacd74"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-415-05","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-415/05","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_130"],"excerpt":"44 First of all, the appellant submits that, before the General Court, he argued that Article 42 of Regulation 2017/1939 did not satisfy the requirements of the right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial laid down in Article 47 of the Charter and that it undermined the jurisdiction of the Cour","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"05ea26f5e06aa19f7472930fab5cda1440b7135b4594eded0e31e14d42263275"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-44-22","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-44/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_183"],"excerpt":"Nor is that article intended to change the system of judicial review laid down by those provisions, and in particular the rules relating to the admissibility of direct actions brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union (see, to that effect, judgment of 10 September 2024, KS and Others","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"cb6dfd336fd960f5b9307de6dea57da768d80c3179d9fb9fd282870264eddae1"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-50-00","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-50/00","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_177"],"excerpt":"However, the EU Courts may rule on an action against such a decision only if that action is based directly on EU law, since those courts do not, in principle, have jurisdiction to examine and interpret national procedural law in the context of the review of the legality of EU acts (see, to that effe","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"83adc248b9ebfb43138e4f78beb0219f06560ade7e36d64ac49d49e57efea866"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-535-22","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-535/22","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_122","para_123","para_124"],"excerpt":"38 In that regard, it should be borne in mind that, in accordance with settled case-law, it follows from the second subparagraph of Article 256(1) TFEU, the first paragraph of Article 58 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and Article 168(1)(d) and Article 169(2) of the Rule","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"045d530239a5a86182725732a911032a07a2a942d53eb96d54bda5ef187a5606"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-583-11","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-583/11","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_153","para_154"],"excerpt":"66 Furthermore, in accordance with Article 19(3) TEU, the FEU Treaty has established, by Articles 263 and 277, on the one hand, and Article 267, on the other, a complete system of legal remedies and procedures designed to ensure judicial review of the legality of EU acts, and has entrusted such revi","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"e00e710d56bbb3fe1bb43ef765fb984911ba6a906e3db369d34a6f8ba21da397"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~follows~c-69-19","type":"follows","label_sv":"följer","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-69/19","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_146"],"excerpt":"59 More specifically, as regards paragraph 29 of the order under appeal, it should be noted that the settled case-law according to which the inadmissibility of the main action leads to the inadmissibility of the plea of illegality raised in support of that action (see, to that effect, judgment of 5 ","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"4650d09a06b033d286e7f7f9b26e33cd74c9188726e219e18e41f432ba5bc229"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~cites~c-328-24","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"C-328/24","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_5"],"excerpt":"In Case C-328/24 P,","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"a98b3d56a0fd80274fd33c34780fbc99ba0d5e5162473c31c74d10ff87b77e6d"},{"edge_id":"edge:eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328~cites~t-385-23","type":"cites","label_sv":"hänvisar till","from":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","to":{"ref":"T-385/23","id":null,"url":null},"paragraph_ids":["para_23"],"excerpt":"1 By his appeal, Mr Constantin Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși seeks to have set aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 28 February 2024, Mincu Pătrașcu Brâncuși v EPPO (T-385/23, ‘the order under appeal’, EU:T:2024:143), by which the General Court dismissed his action seeking annulme","decided":"2026-04-16","hash":"9e9aa65f6c7ca4416ba9909fe8681c208865ac60eeb794fe36957c2bc3479e2d"}],"incoming":[],"acts":[],"counts":{"outgoing":17,"incoming":0,"acts":0},"follow":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328?follow=5","hash":"974fb10ebba0cca8b8d436b64207dc25dd5226ae992fb7f05822f97f76b66e7e"},"links":{"provisions":null,"case_law":{"precedent":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/precedent/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","conflict":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/conflict/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","citation_graph":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/citation_graph/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","weight":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/weight/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328"},"compact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328?view=compact","representations":{"sv":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","en":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/en/eu/praxis/c-328-24-p-62024cj0328"},"machine_languages":["en","sv"],"ref":"eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328"},"watch":{"risk":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk?id=eu%3Ac-328-24-p-62024cj0328","relations":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/relations?id=eu%3Ac-328-24-p-62024cj0328","risk_changes":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/risk-changes","node_state":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-state?id=eu%3Ac-328-24-p-62024cj0328","provenance":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/provenance/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328"},"metadata":{"schema":"novacopilot_object_metadata/1","canonical_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","source":"Source: NovaCopilot","official_source":null,"short_answer":null,"short_answer_status":"not_in_register","hash":"974fb10ebba0cca8b8d436b64207dc25dd5226ae992fb7f05822f97f76b66e7e","schema_version":"1","last_verified_at":null,"verification_status":"not_verified_yet","integrity_check_scope":"stored_content_only"},"hash":"sha256:4c0e42bdd342dc2a8fb3a8160bcd363f9c912216bdc2a36dda177cb5b8aa459b","version":"legal-2026-11-02","expires":"2026-11-04T00:00:00.000Z","dependency":{"index_version":"legal-2026-11-02+legal-2026-11-02+2026-11-02T16:22:18","content_hash":"sha256:4c0e42bdd342dc2a8fb3a8160bcd363f9c912216bdc2a36dda177cb5b8aa459b","revalidate_after":"2026-11-03T07:37:42.609Z","max_copy_age_seconds":3600,"policy":"revalidate-required; attribution-preferred","changelog":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/dependency","verify":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/verify","stale_copy_invalid":true},"canonical":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu:c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","disclaimer":"Source reference with official identifier. Not legal advice and not a compliance decision.","content_notice":{"legal_advice":false,"nature":"Source register. Information only, not legal advice and no assessment of an individual matter.","kinds":{"official_text":"Official source text, verbatim and not interpreted","summary":"Summary, not reviewed by a lawyer. Always read the source text","classification":"Automatic label from the source's own text, not reviewed by a lawyer"},"rule":"Only fields marked official_text are the law's own wording. Everything else points to it.","report_error":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/corrections","ai_act_declaration":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/ai-act-declaration"},"usageInfo":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/citering","withheld":{"links.evidence":3},"access":{"status":"partner_key_required","header":"x-partner-key","contact":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/kontakt","note":"Facts and counts are public. Relationships and decision paths stay inside NovaCopilot."},"access_class":"relationship","access_view":"public","citation":{"citation_url":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/eu/praxis/c-328-24-p-62024cj0328","cite_as":"NovaCopilot (legal.exploreworldai.com)","provenance":{"publisher":"NovaCopilot","signature":"nc-eca320eac0fee81f8c9794711c5d439c","response_hash":"sha256:4c0e42bdd342dc2a8fb3a8160bcd363f9c912216bdc2a36dda177cb5b8aa459b"}},"freshness":{"freshness_class":"live","as_of":"2026-11-03T06:37:43.287Z","valid_for":3600,"recheck":"https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/obj/edge/eu%3Ac-328-24-p-62024cj0328","note":"Kontrollera mot recheck efter valid_for sekunder. If-None-Match ger 304 när inget ändrats.","tokens":5269}}