Court of Justice of the European Union · Judgment
C-116/25Ts. E. S. v Direktor na Teritorialno podelenie na Natsionalnia osiguritelen institut - Blagoevgrad
- Decided
- 2026-04-23
- ECLI
- ECLI:EU:C:2026:336
- CELEX
- 62025CJ0116
- Finality
- Final, the decision cannot be appealed
Also searched as: Case C-116/25, C-116/25 2026, ECLI:EU:C:2026:336.
The court's own keywords
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Social security – Migrant workers – Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 – Unemployment benefits – Calculation – Article 62(1) and (2) – Last activity as an employed or self-employed person pursued under the legislation of a Member State – Article 62(3) – Residence of the recipient of unemployment benefits in a Member State other than the ‘competent Member State’ – Calculation rule which does not take into account ‘exclusively’ the salary or professional income received by the person concerned in respect of his or her last activity as an employed or self-employed person – National legislation providing for a different calculation rule for persons who carried out their last employment in another Member State.
Interprets
Core objects in the machine route
Summary: Final, the decision cannot be appealed
This page shows the judgment and its core data. Risk assessment, relations, changes, agent answers with reasoning and provenance are open without a key in the machine route.
- Finality status
- Precedent and holding
- Relations between precedents
- Agent object, risk graph and relation graph
- Change graph
- Provenance and verified text
Source: NovaCopilot
Node map: relations between precedents
How the judgment has been affected over time, read from the judgments' own text. Every step has paragraph and hash in the machine route.
Reading relations …
Source: NovaCopilot
Retrieved directly from EUR-Lex when you click. No permanent storage on our side. How it works
Machine addresses
- id
- eu:c-116-25
Read from EU:s publikationsbyrå, Cellar (EUR-Lex och CURIA) on 2026-08-22.
The row repeats what the source states. It is not a summary, not a conclusion about any single case and not legal advice.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit