Agent · dsa-2022-2065-21
DSA artikel 21: Out-of-court dispute settlement
Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.
CELEX 32022R2065 · 2026-08-18 · Weight 76 · minimal-risk
ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.
- What this page is
- Agent, DSA artikel 21
- Checked against the official source
- 2026-08-18Current
- Responsible publisher
- ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position
Short answer
What does DSA Article 21 require, and what outcome does the rule tree give?
DSA Article 21 is tested here by a deterministic rule tree of 14 rules, built from the article's own conditions. The tree reads your facts and names the outcome that applies, starting with Paragraph 1 applies, carrying paragraph citation, content hash and read date 2026-08-18 against CELEX 32022R2065. The outcome is a machine classification, not a compliance decision.
DSA Article 21Checked against the publisher 2026-08-18Official text
- Paragraph 1 applies. 1. Recipients of the service, including individuals or entities that have submitted notices, addressed by the decisions referred to in Article 20(1) shall be entitled to select any out-of-court dispute settlement body that has been certified in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article in order to resolve disputes relating to those decisions, including complaints that have not been resolved by means of the internal…
- Paragraph 2 applies. Providers of online platforms shall ensure that information about the possibility for recipients of the service to have access to an out-of-court dispute settlement, as referred to in the first subparagraph, is easily accessible on their online interface, clear and user-friendly.
- Paragraph 3 applies. The first subparagraph is without prejudice to the right of the recipient of the service concerned to initiate, at any stage, proceedings to contest those decisions by the providers of online platforms before a court in accordance with the applicable law.
A source reference, not legal advice.
Jurisdiction
The same agent, read through one country's lens.
Inputs
- in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
- punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14)
Rule tree
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)
Paragraph 1 applies
1. Recipients of the service, including individuals or entities that have submitted notices, addressed by the decisions referred to in Article 20(1) shall be entitled to select any out-of-court dispute settlement body that has been certified in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article in order to resolve disputes relating to those decisions, including complaints that have not been resolved by means of the internal…
Paragraph 1
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)
Paragraph 2 applies
Providers of online platforms shall ensure that information about the possibility for recipients of the service to have access to an out-of-court dispute settlement, as referred to in the first subparagraph, is easily accessible on their online interface, clear and user-friendly.
Paragraph 2
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)
Paragraph 3 applies
The first subparagraph is without prejudice to the right of the recipient of the service concerned to initiate, at any stage, proceedings to contest those decisions by the providers of online platforms before a court in accordance with the applicable law.
Paragraph 3
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)
Paragraph 4 applies
2. Both parties shall engage, in good faith, with the selected certified out-of-court dispute settlement body with a view to resolving the dispute.
Paragraph 4
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)
Paragraph 5 applies
Providers of online platforms may refuse to engage with such out-of-court dispute settlement body if a dispute has already been resolved concerning the same information and the same grounds of alleged illegality or incompatibility of content.
Paragraph 5
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 6)
Paragraph 6 applies
The certified out-of-court dispute settlement body shall not have the power to impose a binding settlement of the dispute on the parties.
Paragraph 6
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 7)
Paragraph 7 applies
3. The Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State where the out-of-court dispute settlement body is established shall, for a maximum period of five years, which may be renewed, certify the body, at its request, where the body has demonstrated that it meets all of the following conditions:
Paragraph 7
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 8)
Paragraph 8 applies
(a)
Paragraph 8
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 9)
Paragraph 9 applies
it is impartial and independent, including financially independent, of providers of online platforms and of recipients of the service provided by providers of online platforms, including of individuals or entities that have submitted notices;
Paragraph 9
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 10)
Paragraph 10 applies
(b)
Paragraph 10
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 11)
Paragraph 11 applies
it has the necessary expertise in relation to the issues arising in one or more particular areas of illegal content, or in relation to the application and enforcement of terms and conditions of one or more types of online platform, allowing the body to contribute effectively to the settlement of a dispute;
Paragraph 11
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 12)
Paragraph 12 applies
(c)
Paragraph 12
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 13)
Paragraph 13 applies
its members are remunerated in a way that is not linked to the outcome of the procedure;
Paragraph 13
If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 14)
Paragraph 14 applies
(d)
Paragraph 14
If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.
The article text as read
- 11. Recipients of the service, including individuals or entities that have submitted notices, addressed by the decisions referred to in Article 20(1) shall be entitled to select any out-of-court dispute settlement body that has been certified in accordance with paragraph 3 of this Article in order to resolve disputes relating to those decisions, including complaints that have not been resolved by means of the internal complaint-handling system referred to in that Article.
- 2Providers of online platforms shall ensure that information about the possibility for recipients of the service to have access to an out-of-court dispute settlement, as referred to in the first subparagraph, is easily accessible on their online interface, clear and user-friendly.
- 3The first subparagraph is without prejudice to the right of the recipient of the service concerned to initiate, at any stage, proceedings to contest those decisions by the providers of online platforms before a court in accordance with the applicable law.
- 42. Both parties shall engage, in good faith, with the selected certified out-of-court dispute settlement body with a view to resolving the dispute.
- 5Providers of online platforms may refuse to engage with such out-of-court dispute settlement body if a dispute has already been resolved concerning the same information and the same grounds of alleged illegality or incompatibility of content.
- 6The certified out-of-court dispute settlement body shall not have the power to impose a binding settlement of the dispute on the parties.
- 73. The Digital Services Coordinator of the Member State where the out-of-court dispute settlement body is established shall, for a maximum period of five years, which may be renewed, certify the body, at its request, where the body has demonstrated that it meets all of the following conditions:
- 8(a)
- 9it is impartial and independent, including financially independent, of providers of online platforms and of recipients of the service provided by providers of online platforms, including of individuals or entities that have submitted notices;
- 10(b)
- 11it has the necessary expertise in relation to the issues arising in one or more particular areas of illegal content, or in relation to the application and enforcement of terms and conditions of one or more types of online platform, allowing the body to contribute effectively to the settlement of a dispute;
- 12(c)
- 13its members are remunerated in a way that is not linked to the outcome of the procedure;
- 14(d)
Lineage
Interface
Hashes
Artefacts
No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.
Citation: 32022R2065 art. 21, Out-of-court dispute settlement. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/dsa-2022-2065/artikel-21 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:c1b9cc206b0f2e0a, bygge legal-2026-08-25).