Legal sources with official primary sources

Printed ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

Source status and reading dates are reported separately. A reading date is not source verification.

Agent · cyberresiliens-2024-2847-55

Cyberresiliensakten artikel 55: Union safeguard procedure

What is an agent? Agents execute decisions.

Structural tree: the article's own paragraphs, verbatim.

Also searched as: Cyber Resilience Act article 55 · CRA article 55 · Regulation (EU) 2024/2847 article 55

CELEX 32024R2847 · 2026-08-18 · Weight 78 · minimal-risk

ExtendedOperational weight but lower priority. Metered by volume, not per call, once metering is switched on.

CyberresiliensaktenOfficial source

What this page is
Agent, Cyberresiliensakten artikel 55
Checked against the official source
2026-08-18Expired
Responsible publisher
ExploreWorld Legal, editorial deskLiability position

NovaCopilot reasons out a short answer from statutes and case law, with the source right below. 5 answers a day are free.

NovaCopilot reasons: a short answer of at most 75 words, built only on our register, with the source right below.

Source: NovaCopilot

Jurisdiction

The same agent, read through one country's lens.

Inputs

  • in_scopeThe article applies to the situationboolean
  • punktParagraph of the articleenum (1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5)

Rule tree

  1. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 1)

    Paragraph 1 applies

    1. Where, within three months of receipt of the notification referred to in Article 54(5), objections are raised by a Member State against a measure taken by another Member State, or where the Commission considers the measure to be contrary to Union law, the Commission shall without delay enter into consultation with the relevant Member State and the economic operator or operators and shall evaluate the national meas…

    Paragraph 1

  2. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 2)

    Paragraph 2 addressed to the Member States, no direct obligation for businesses

    2. If the national measure is considered to be justified, all Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the non-compliant product with digital elements is withdrawn from their market, and shall inform the Commission accordingly. If the national measure is not considered to be justified, the Member State concerned shall withdraw the measure.

    Paragraph 2

  3. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 3)

    Paragraph 3 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses

    3. Where the national measure is considered to be justified and the non-compliance of the product with digital elements is attributed to shortcomings in the harmonised standards, the Commission shall apply the procedure provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012.

    Paragraph 3

  4. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 4)

    Paragraph 4 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses

    4. Where the national measure is considered to be justified and the non-compliance of the product with digital elements is attributed to shortcomings in a European cybersecurity certification scheme as referred to in Article 27, the Commission shall consider whether to amend or repeal any delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 27(9) that specifies the presumption of conformity concerning that certification scheme.

    Paragraph 4

  5. If: alla(in_scope = true, punkt = 5)

    Paragraph 5 addressed to the Commission, no direct obligation for businesses

    5. Where the national measure is considered to be justified and the non-compliance of the product with digital elements is attributed to shortcomings in common specifications as referred to in Article 27, the Commission shall consider whether to amend or repeal any implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 27(2) setting out those common specifications.

    Paragraph 5

If no rule matches: The article is not stated to apply, or no paragraph is selected. The agent abstains rather than guesses.

The article text as read

  1. 11. Where, within three months of receipt of the notification referred to in Article 54(5), objections are raised by a Member State against a measure taken by another Member State, or where the Commission considers the measure to be contrary to Union law, the Commission shall without delay enter into consultation with the relevant Member State and the economic operator or operators and shall evaluate the national measure. On the basis of the results of that evaluation, the Commission shall decide whether the national measure is justified or not within nine months from the notification referred to in Article 54(5) and notify that decision to the Member State concerned.
  2. 22. If the national measure is considered to be justified, all Member States shall take the measures necessary to ensure that the non-compliant product with digital elements is withdrawn from their market, and shall inform the Commission accordingly. If the national measure is not considered to be justified, the Member State concerned shall withdraw the measure.
  3. 33. Where the national measure is considered to be justified and the non-compliance of the product with digital elements is attributed to shortcomings in the harmonised standards, the Commission shall apply the procedure provided for in Article 11 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012.
  4. 44. Where the national measure is considered to be justified and the non-compliance of the product with digital elements is attributed to shortcomings in a European cybersecurity certification scheme as referred to in Article 27, the Commission shall consider whether to amend or repeal any delegated act adopted pursuant to Article 27(9) that specifies the presumption of conformity concerning that certification scheme.
  5. 55. Where the national measure is considered to be justified and the non-compliance of the product with digital elements is attributed to shortcomings in common specifications as referred to in Article 27, the Commission shall consider whether to amend or repeal any implementing act adopted pursuant to Article 27(2) setting out those common specifications.

Lineage

treatyTFEU art. 288 (förordning)
act32024R2847
chapter-
article55
paragraphs5
jurisdictionEuropean Union (EU)
supervisor-
national-

Interface

callhttps://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/agents/cyberresiliens-2024-2847-55/run
methodGET
outputmatched, outcome, trace, missing, hash
Quota60 anrop per minut och adress, utan nyckel
stabilityRegelträdet versioneras. En ändring byter artefakthash, aldrig adress.

Hashes

textsha256:5d83669860f5f1138e504f1553afa2c82dd5b6d8090ea5542f9c05e80403e026
scriptsha256:a473c3a11c398410cc18690cb5d524d0643fcebc0f3724eac11de85e87c92866
enginesha256:0a4bd50d21f8ec9be383fc091511008b76ad61909cbfb674eab56fe567fbd7a0
agentsha256:d7e263ca73fc44d50901816fd1f010b153dade2d314dcdacec36a482b9423519
versionagent-engine-1+legal-2026-11-03 / d7e263ca73fc44d5

Artefacts

No legal advice. Deterministisk regeluppslagning. Ingen juridisk rådgivning, inget efterlevnadsbeslut, ingen bedömning av ett enskilt ärende.

Citation: 32024R2847 art. 55, Union safeguard procedure. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/agent/cyberresiliens-2024-2847/artikel-55 (hämtad 2026-08-18, bevis sha256:eaafbe0e638dfdf7, bygge legal-2026-11-03).