Clayton Antitrust Act
15 U.S.C. §§ 12 to 27 · Read 2026-08-15
In force since 1914. Section 7 is the merger provision applied in transaction review, Section 4 carries the private treble damages action, and Section 8 addresses interlocking directorates.
Identifier
- Identifier
- 15 U.S.C. §§ 12 to 27
- Level
- Federal
- Status
- In force
- Adopted
- 1914-10-15
- Applies from
- 1914-10-15
- Supervisory bodies
- DOJ Antitrust, FTC
Named requirements
Private right of action
Threefold damages, costs and attorney fees for injury to business or property.
Mergers and acquisitions
Acquisitions whose effect may be substantially to lessen competition.
Premerger notification
Filing and waiting period before closing a reportable transaction.
Interlocking directorates
Serving as director or officer of competing corporations above the size thresholds.
Official source
United States case law
19 decisions · Read from CourtListener, Free Law Project on 2026-08-22.
- Drabinsky v. Actors' Equity Association
106 F.4th 2062d Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- Relevent Sports v. U.S. Soccer Federation
61 F.4th 2992d Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- Don't Look Media LLC v. Fly Victor Limited
999 F.3d 128411th Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- Steves and Sons, Inc. v. Jeld-Wen, Inc.
988 F.3d 6904th Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- Christine Bearden v. Ballad Health
967 F.3d 5136th Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- Connecticut Ironworkers Employers Ass'n v. New England Regional Council of Carpenters
869 F.3d 922d Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- Conn. Ironworkers Emp'rs Ass'n v. New England Reg'l Council of Carpenters
2d Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- American Sales Co. v. AstraZeneca LP
842 F.3d 341st Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the First Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- In re: Nexium Antitrust v.
1st Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the First Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America v. Federal Trade Commission
416 U.S. App. D.C. 129D.C. Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- Dow Chemical Co. v. Seegott Holdings, Inc.
768 F.3d 124510th Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
- In re: Urethane AntiTrust Liti v.
10th Cir.Open to review by a higher court, the source does not state the outcome
Ask NovaCopilotGet the opinionRetrieved directly from Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit when you click. No permanent storage on our side.
Change monitoring
The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Register | DOJ Antitrust, 15 U.S.C. §§ 12 to 27 |
| Publisher | U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division |
| Last read | 2026-08-15 |
| Interval | Every 30 days |
| Next re-read | 2026-09-14 |
| Status | Re-read overdue |
Row history
Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.
| Date | Event | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-15 | Row read against the official publication | U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division |
| 1914-10-15 | Adopted under 15 U.S.C. §§ 12 to 27 | U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division |
| 1914-10-15 | Date of application according to the publisher | U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division |
Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.
Cite this row
The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.
15 U.S.C. §§ 12 to 27, Clayton Antitrust Act. NovaCopilot, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/us/regler/clayton-act (hämtad 2026-10-23, bevis sha256:ce03dd25b3f560f4, bygge legal-2026-10-23).
- sha256:
- ce03dd25b3f560f4ef8ae3d550261d4d7f7060b818ee0496207aae7bedd08927
- hämtad:
- 2026-10-23
- source_confidence:
- derived
- bygge:
- legal-2026-10-23
Derived path to the publisher. The address is built from the identifier and lands in the publisher's own register. uscode.house.gov.
The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.
Verifiable trust signals
- Source-linked answers and explicit evidence gaps
- Obligations, controls, risks and consequences
- Stable objects and verifiable checksums
- Rule-based objects, optional source-linked reasoning
- Model card, source status and audit