Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
ExploreWorldAIExploreWorldAI

RH 2019:19

Anhörigbehörighet enligt 17 kap. föräldrabalken har inte ansetts vara ett alternativ till godmanskap när det funnits motsättningar mellan…

Anhörigbehörighet enligt 17 kap. föräldrabalken har inte ansetts vara ett alternativ till godmanskap när det funnits motsättningar mellan den enskildes barn.

The decision in three points

  1. What the court said

    Anhörigbehörighet enligt 17 kap. föräldrabalken har inte ansetts vara ett alternativ till godmanskap när det funnits motsättningar mellan den enskildes barn.

  2. Why it matters

    Decision by Svea hovrätt, 2019. Applies Föräldrabalken.

Risk profile of the decision

MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.

  • Applies one statute
  • 299 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about family and migration.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2019-19/manifest.json

    Court
    Svea hovrätt
    Decided
    2019-07-17
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr ÖÄ 6462-19

    • 17 kap. 2 § föräldrabalken (1949:381)
    Svea hovrätt, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-08-29.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-08-29
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-09-28
    StatusChecked against the publisher
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2019-07-17Date of decision according to Svea hovrättSvea hovrätt
    1950-01-01Applied statute in force: SFS 1949:381Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    Cite this row

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    RH 2019:19, Anhörigbehörighet enligt 17 kap. föräldrabalken har inte ansetts vara ett alternativ till godmanskap när det funnits motsättningar mellan den enskildes barn.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2019-19 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:c871169ec74863ff, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

    Machine addressHow to cite the platform
    sha256:
    c871169ec74863ff4ec27379867822133dfdd6c1d10a3fd9d58aa964c471b13c
    hämtad:
    2026-08-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-08-25
    officiell källa:
    https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/ab44c478-9e2d-4ef2-8e6b-0907f4e8430a

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Svea hovrätt, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.