Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer

RH 2018:39

Majoritetsaktieägarna i ett aktiebolag har missbrukat sitt inflytande i bolaget på ett sådant sätt att det funnits skäl för…

Majoritetsaktieägarna i ett aktiebolag har missbrukat sitt inflytande i bolaget på ett sådant sätt att det funnits skäl för tvångslikvidation av bolaget.

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Majoritetsaktieägarna i ett aktiebolag har missbrukat sitt inflytande i bolaget på ett sådant sätt att det funnits skäl för tvångslikvidation av bolaget.

  2. Why it matters

    Decision by Svea hovrätt, 2018. Applies ABL.

Risk profile of the decision

MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.

  • Applies one statute
  • 80 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about company law and accounting.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

  • ABLSFS 2005:551

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2018-39/manifest.json

    Court
    Svea hovrätt
    Decided
    2018-05-09
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr T 3226-17

    • 7 kap. 36 §, 17 kap. 2 § samt 25 kap. 21 § och 28 § aktiebolagslagen (2005:551)
    Svea hovrätt, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Statutes

    • ABL

      SFS 2005:551 · Company law and accounting

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-08-29.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-08-29
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-09-28
    StatusChecked against the publisher
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2018-05-09Date of decision according to Svea hovrättSvea hovrätt
    2006-01-01Applied statute in force: SFS 2005:551Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    RH 2018:39, Majoritetsaktieägarna i ett aktiebolag har missbrukat sitt inflytande i bolaget på ett sådant sätt att det funnits skäl för tvångslikvidation av bolaget.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2018-39 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:72f7c81b0c962f34, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

    sha256:
    72f7c81b0c962f34262ffa13223c9b71a8efabb5cc9e4fd2331ead485fcab520
    hämtad:
    2026-08-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-08-25

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Svea hovrätt, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.