Rättskällor med officiella primärkällor

Utskrivet ·

Skip to main content
Skip to the answer
ExploreWorldAIExploreWorldAI

RH 2016:73

Talan om att faderskapserkännande ska förklaras sakna verkan har avvisats, trots att den utpekade mannen enligt DNA-analys bevisats inte…

Talan om att faderskapserkännande ska förklaras sakna verkan har avvisats, trots att den utpekade mannen enligt DNA-analys bevisats inte vara far till barnet.

The decision in three points

  1. What happened

    Talan om att faderskapserkännande ska förklaras sakna verkan har avvisats, trots att den utpekade mannen enligt DNA-analys bevisats inte vara far till barnet.

  2. Why it matters

    Decision by Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, 2016. Applies Föräldrabalken.

Risk profile of the decision

MediumThe decision carries medium weight. Read it with the statute before relying on it alone.

  • Applies one statute
  • 299 other decisions in the register apply the same statute

The decision in context

The decision is used in questions about family and migration.

Relations of the decision in the graph

Statutes (1)

Questions (0)

    Decisions (8)

    Agent commands

    • runCaseSummary()

      The core question and the decision in three points, verbatim from the published summary.

    • runLegalImpact()

      Risk profile, statutes and the decisions applying the same statute.

    • runObligationCheck()

      Deterministic test of whether the decision is guiding for your question.

    • runProofVerify()

      Check that the hash you cite belongs to this node.

    https://legal.exploreworldai.com/api/public/v1/node-agents/avgorande/rh-2016-73/manifest.json

    Court
    Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland
    Decided
    2016-11-02
    Applies
    1

    Mål nr Ö 808-15

    • 1 kap. 4 § och 3 kap. 1 § andra stycket föräldrabalken (1949:381)
    Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, Sveriges Domstolar

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row.

    Statutes

    Case law

    Case law read on 2026-08-29.

    Change monitoring

    The row is re-read against the publisher's own publication on a fixed interval. The dates below can be checked on the spot and travel with the API response.

    Change monitoring
    FieldValue
    RegisterSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    PublisherSveriges Domstolar
    Last read2026-08-29
    IntervalEvery 30 days
    Next re-read2026-09-28
    StatusChecked against the publisher
    Open the register at the publisher

    Row history

    Dated events concerning this exact row, newest first. No event appears here without a date in a primary source.

    Row history
    DateEventSource
    2026-08-29Row read against the courts' own registerSök rättspraxis, Sveriges Domstolar
    2016-11-02Date of decision according to Hovrätten för Nedre NorrlandHovrätten för Nedre Norrland
    1950-01-01Applied statute in force: SFS 1949:381Sveriges riksdag

    Monitoring states when the row was checked, not how the legal position should be assessed.

    Cite this row

    The string below travels with a memo, a case file or an agent chain. The same string sits in the citation field of the API response.

    RH 2016:73, Talan om att faderskapserkännande ska förklaras sakna verkan har avvisats, trots att den utpekade mannen enligt DNA-analys bevisats inte vara far till barnet.. ExploreWorld Legal, https://legal.exploreworldai.com/juridik/praxis/rh-2016-73 (hämtad 2026-08-25, bevis sha256:900ee2644bb57c05, bygge legal-2026-08-25).

    Machine addressHow to cite the platform
    sha256:
    900ee2644bb57c052c8d0861aa5983b331beb103f20f92c913cbd05e827915b9
    hämtad:
    2026-08-25
    source_confidence:
    official
    bygge:
    legal-2026-08-25
    officiell källa:
    https://rattspraxis.etjanst.domstol.se/sok/publicering/121cf601-4b66-482c-aabf-2dcbc49d747c

    Official publication. The address points to the authority or court that published the row. Hovrätten för Nedre Norrland, Sveriges Domstolar.

    The row is a source reference with an official identifier. No legal advice and no compliance decision.